by David Christopher
This new tax will make Internet access even more expensive, despite the fact Canadians already pay among the highest prices in the industrialized world for this basic necessity. Fees are already so high that 44 percent of low-income households do not have a home Internet connection, leaving vast numbers of Canadians excluded from our digital endowment.
The ISP tax is the brainchild of Canada’s large publishers and broadcasters who have been using government consultations to ascertain how to fund Canadian content to push their plan. In a nutshell, they want to burden Canadian Internet users with an ISP tax in order to subsidize industries struggling to adapt to the digital age.
If implemented, an ISP tax will have serious consequences for our digital future. Making our sky-high Internet bills even more expensive will make it even tougher for low-income Canadians to surmount barriers to access, excluding them from the benefits of the open Internet. An ISP tax will also force low-income Canadian households – now barely managing to afford Internet access – offline, further exacerbating our stark digital divide.
Such a levy will especially impact residents of rural and northern Canada who, as a recent OpenMedia report revealed, are already coping with ridiculously high Internet costs, low data caps and extortionate overage charges. Again, for many northern households, including many Indigenous and Inuit communities, an ISP tax could make the difference between having limited Internet access and being forced offline entirely.
If Canadian Heritage introduces an ISP tax, they will also completely undermine efforts by other parts of the government to make the Internet more accessible and affordable for Canadians – a key component of Canada’s overall digital strategy. Put simply, the ISP tax will mean Canada goes backwards, not forwards, when it comes to fostering innovation and connectivity.
Finally, while few of us enjoy paying taxes, most of us accept them as the price we pay to live in a cohesive society with decent public services. However, when you look at the industry-specific taxes that people find acceptable, they are overwhelmingly “sin taxes” on products like alcohol or tobacco, which have clear, negative impacts on our society. An ISP tax would be the opposite – the Internet is a public good and there is abundant evidence that maximizing access to the Internet has very positive impacts for society and our digital economy.
Rather than pushing this regressive new tax, we can best support Canadian content by tackling affordability issues head-on. By bridging the digital divide, we can ensure all Canadians can access and create Canadian content. There are also sensible alternatives for funding Canadian content, such as applying sales taxes to foreign, online streaming services or redirecting the proceeds of wireless spectrum auctions.
OpenMedia will work hard to make sure the ISP tax never gets off the ground. Keep in touch at OpenMedia.org or follow us on Facebook or Twitter at OpenMediaOrg
David Christopher is communications manager with OpenMedia, which works to keep the Internet open, affordable and surveillance-free. openmedia.org