Premier Gordon Campbell and Minister Joyce Murray promise
all will be well in the woods for the last grizzly bears
and spotted owls in Canada.
Common Ground's December 2002 cover story about grizzly
bears at risk due to both hunting and habitat destuction
did not find favour with our Minister of Water, Land and
Air Protection.
We welcomed her initial response and look forward to hearing
her further response early in January once she has had
"the occasion to study the panel's report". Here
is the minister's letter accompanied by a letter by Chris
Genovali who wrote the original "inflammatory"
article. Readers are encouraged to participate in this
discussion by sending Letters to the Editor at Common Ground,
the Minister, and Mr. Genovali.
December 12, 2002
Editor
Common Ground Magazine
I am writing in response to an article by Chris Genovali
(Government Hiding Information on Grizzly Killings) published
in the December issue of your magazine. The article contains
inflammatory and inaccurate information about grizzly
bear management in British Columbia and deserves correction.
One of the clear commitments that this government
made prior to being elected was to replace the blanket
moratorium on grizzly bear hunting with a proper peer
review by scientists and biologists, and local moratoriums
to address conservation concerns. This commitment is
consistent with our government’s approach to managing
the environment with principled science underpinning
our decision, not political opportunism.
In support of making science-based decisions, we
have enlisted the help of an independent Grizzly Bear
Scientific Panel made up of respected scientists and
academics. The panel will submit its findings at the
end of December and their results will help ensure that
our approach is sustainable and scientifically sound.
Your readers can look forward to a further response from
me once I have had occasion to study the panel’s
report.
Consistent with this approach, we remain open to
any science-based information that can better inform
our policy development and decision-making. If in fact
Mr. Genovali has any such evidence, I invite him to submit
it and contribute to this process.
Best regards,
Joyce Murray
Minister of Water, Land and Air Protection
PO Box 9047
STN PROV GOVT
Victoria BC
V8W 9E2
Email: joyce.murray.mla@leg.bc.ca
Tel: 250 387-1187
Fax: 250 387-1356
www.gov.bc.ca
Chris Genovali replies:
Dear Editor:
The only thing that deserves correction is Joyce
Murray s incessant propaganda regarding the grizzly hunt.
The Liberals decision to overturn the moratorium
and reinstate the grizzly hunt was based on political
science, not biological science. What does it say about
a government that has the resumption of killing grizzly
bears for sport as one of the very first priorities on
its agenda? The Liberals have no interest in science;
they are simply on a vindictive mission to repudiate
each and every policy the NDP enacted, good or bad. The
fact is the Liberals never had an official position on
the grizzly hunt until the previous government announced
the moratorium.
The province s questionable grizzly bear management
has been thoroughly criticized by both independent and
government biologists. Dr. Brian Horejsi, a wildlife
scientist with 30 years of grizzly bear research experience,
has said that current government grizzly population estimates
have no foundation in science and are primarily paper
exercises extrapolating numbers from two radio telemetry
study areas. Dionys deLeeuw, a government biologist who
has had a gag order imposed upon him for exposing the
pseudo-science used to justify the hunt, has revealed
that "the allowable kill of 300 grizzlies per year
established in 1979 was exceeded every year from 1965
to 1997, on average by 236 bears." According to
deLeeuw, female grizzly kill was especially excessive,
as the province "has allowed an extensive female
overkill for at least the past 33 years."
Murray and her government have gone to extraordinary
lengths in refusing to comply with rulings by both the
Information and Privacy Commissioner and the BC Supreme
Court to provide Raincoast Conservation Society with
information that is critical to grizzly bear conservation.
Raincoast is seeking site specific grizzly kill location
data in order to conduct an independent scientific analysis.
This type of analysis is essential to understanding the
impacts of sport hunting on grizzly bear populations
throughout the province. But information is power and
Murray and her ministry's special interest supporters
(i.e., grizzly hunting lobby groups) know this quite
well. Murray s actions are clearly designed to keep the
public in the dark, placing the citizens of BC at a severe
disadvantage when attempting to participate in the decision
making process regarding grizzly bear conservation.
The so-called independent science panel that was
struck by Murray when the Liberals overturned the moratorium
will not be analyzing the aforementioned grizzly kill
location data, casting doubt on the credibility of their
entire process. Despite pledging that her ministry will
ensure openness and accountability in all our decisions,
the science panel was hand picked behind closed doors
with no opportunity for public input. Not one of the
leading Canadian grizzly bear experts was appointed to
the panel; it doesn t appear to be a coincidence that
they all supported a moratorium on the hunt. In addition,
Murray made a commitment that all of the information
provided by her ministry to the panel for analysis would
be made public, but despite multiple requests by Raincoast,
she has refused to provide access to that information.
Murray’s facile attempt to spin her shoot-first-ask-questions-later
approach as some sort of grizzly bear conservation initiative
would be laughable were the consequences not so deadly
serious.
Sincerely,
Chris Genovali
Executive Director
Raincoast Conservation Society
P.O. Box 8663
Victoria, B.C. V8W 3S2
Tel: 250-655-1229
Fax: 250-655-1339
Email: chris@raincoast.org
Website: www.raincoast.org
Premier Gordon Campbell's Letter
to the Editor from the December 6th, 2002 New York Times
was faxed to Common Ground by the Western Canada Wilderness
Committee (www.wildernesscommittee.org). It was his response
to an article about the logging of ancient forests in
southwestern British Columbia, home of the last 25 pairs
of spotted owls in Canada.
To the Editor:
Your Dec. 4 Grouse Mountain Journal, about the spotted
owl in British Columbia, suggests that species-at-risk
conservation takes a back seat to logging in British
Columbia. British Columbia is concerned about the spotted
owl and its delicate situation. As responsible stewards
of the forests, we're assessing potential actions of
species preservation.
The provincial governement, forest companies and
other stakeholders are working together to identify means
of addressing management and recovery of the spotted
owl in British Columbia. Habitat decisions are made with
the best available understanding of scientific and socioeconomic
factors affecting species sustainability, not with lumber
interests solely in mind.
There is more old-growth in British Columbia now
than 100 years ago, amounting to 62 million acres. That
total is projected to increase in the century ahead.
GORDON CAMPBELL
Premier
Vancouver, British Columbia
Dec. 6, 2002
Premier Gordon Campbell
PO Box 9041, Stn Prov Govt
Victoria BC V8W 9E1
Phone: 250 387-1715
Fax: 250 387-0087
Email: premier@gov.bc.ca
www.gov.bc.ca
Top
|