Clean tech: God bless the Pope

by Bruce Mason

portrait of Pope Francis• A global chorus now has a conductor with impeccable timing and sense of harmony, a man who connects all the dots while just getting warmed up. Of the 300 formal teachings on Catholic doctrine over 275 years, Pope Francis’ Laudato Si: On the Care of Our Common Home is like music; it’s universal.

The Pope’s uncompromising indictment of the global market economy – accusing it of plundering the Earth at the expense of the poor and future generations – will profoundly change, or at least shape, history. It is an explosive, unprecedented analysis that will inform and inspire action on climate change, poverty and inequality for years to come.

In less than 200 pages, Pope Francis makes about 250 points. Anyone who has read this far will get it; our ecological crisis is essentially a spiritual problem.

The manslaughter of our planet is our defining existential challenge. And our collective failure to commit to meaningful reductions is a political and moral travesty and catastrophe, particularly for the poorest and most marginalized.

This, says Pope Francis, is a human crisis. The solution is not simply to eliminate fossil fuels or rethink carbon credits. It is to rediscover what it means to be human, what he calls “integral ecology,” including a rejection of the cults of economic growth, material accumulation and the irrational myth of unlimited progress.

“The violence present in our hearts, wounded by sin, is also reflected in the symptoms of sickness evident in the soil, in the water, in the air and in all forms of life,” he writes. “The ecological crisis is also a summons to profound interior conversion.”

His intention is to provoke unprecedented action – to fundamentally convert how humans understand their place and responsibility to our imperilled planet. “Everything is connected” is a constant refrain, and fair and just management of the “global commons,” a common theme.

It is the right message at the right time from the right person making the clearest and loudest moral case ever. This is a leader who makes us want to be better people. Don’t forget he brokered normalization of US-Cuba relations and brought Israel and Palestine leaders together in the same room. He is now pushing hard for climate-conscious polices on a scale that countries and organizations have not yet achieved.

He is admired, respected and even loved by more than 1.2 billion Catholics. And we’re fascinated by him and by his ability to communicate through simple language and behaviour. He also has street creds; he is the world’s most influential tweeter – re-tweeted more than Barack Obama, even Justin Bieber. Unprecedented global interest in his long-awaited encyclical crashed the Vatican website and generated hundreds of headlines and commentaries in dozens of languages. It is accessible, masterful, and in places, beautiful.

His carefully timed intervention is much more than a passing distraction from business as usual. In September, the first pope from the Southern hemisphere will also be the first to address the joint Congress and Senate in Washington – the lion’s den – as well as the UN.

He has already addressed “everyone living on the planet,” amid the ongoing success of fossil fuel divestment, and in concert with the Oslo Principles on Global Climate Change Obligation -which argued that governments are in flagrant breach of legal obligations to the planet. This was a few days before a Dutch court ordered the state to reduce emissions by 25% within five years; it was the first climate liability court case. Norway and Belgium are following suit. In Canada, more than five million people have signed the Blue Dot declaration to recognize their right to a healthy environment.

Counting down to make-or-break talks in Paris in December at the UN Climate Change Conference, leaders are now looking over their shoulders not only at the Pope; they’re also looking for legal challenges to inadequate emissions-cutting pledges.

UN Climate Change Secretariat Christiana Figueres – charged with making an international climate deal – says, “Transformation is on its way, irreversible, picking up speed. The encyclical will have a major impact on the moral imperative of addressing climate change to protect the most vulnerable.”

The climate, the atmosphere, oceans and forests are “global commons,” the Pope insists, belonging to all – not a “no man’s land” of raw material, governed only by the law of the jungle and survival of the greediest.

Short-term-minded governments and enterprises won’t save us, he warns, switching global attention away from macro solutions by policy summits to personal ethics of environmental stewardship. The infuriating impasse of more than two decades of squandered international negotiations has created an appearance of inevitability. Our life-and-death crisis is exacerbated by an obsession with GDP, which doesn’t record the degradation of Earth or the abject inequities between and within countries. Truly comprehensive cost-benefit analysis must give planetary wellbeing as much standing as it gives the bottom line and place global common good above national interests, Pope Francis advises.

The global market for clean tech – $1 trillion in 2010 – is projected to grow to $3 trillion by 2020, behind only energy (oil and gas) and arms sales. But the IMF estimates that when impacts of climate change are factored in, fossil fuel companies receive $14.5 billion in subsidies every day ($5.3 trillion in 2015). Without this obscene handout, they can no longer compete with clean energy technology.

“Revolutionary” and “radical” is the Pope’s clarion call for extraordinary change in human vision and behaviour and for sacrifice, especially from the rich and powerful who owe an “ecological debt.” “Remarkable” is his emphasis on the force of love – not fear – to motivate us.

Linking poverty, economics and ecological destruction, the Pope calls on the world to deliver common good. Poverty and ecological crises don’t just exist, they are caused, he says, casting blame on transnational corporations, criticizing the foreign debt system as control of the poor.

Without public pressure, there will be no progress in a transition to clean energy, the Pope warns. To “protect our common home,” we must actively confront fossil fuels economics and take bold action to scale solutions to climate change.

Here at home, Analytica Advisors’ just released 2015 Canadian Clean Technology Industry Report notes that, despite impressive growth in revenue and employment – four times the rate of the overall national economy – our fastest growing industry lost 41% of its global share of clean technology in a decade, the biggest loser of market share among the top 24 exporting countries.

We are wasting opportunity and we have no government policy, strategy, integrated approach, government ministry or even a debate.

Céline Bak, president of Analytica Advisors, told Common Ground: “This encyclical makes our overdue debate more likely, grounded in both evidence and humanity, democratic, science-based, informed by values which Canadians hold dear. And it affirms the need to consider our part in contributing solutions and helping others face climate change.”

Bruce Mason is a Vancouver and Gabriola-Island based five-string banjo player, gardener, freelance writer and author of Our Clinic. brucemason@shaw.ca

photo wiki commons

Vancouver Farmers’ Markets

20 years of farm to table goodness

blueberries• For the last 20 years, Vancouver Farmers Markets have fed people and created community. We are a registered non-profit society that supports small farm production, nourishes community and connects neighbours. Founded in 1995, Vancouver Farmers Markets (VFM) has grown to become one of Canada’s leading organizers of farmers markets, with nine weekly markets that support over 250 producers and host 450,000 shoppers per year.

When you shop at a Vancouver Farmers Market, you’re not just buying fresh, delicious food directly from local producers; you’re taking an active part in the local food revolution and helping to create a sustainable food system in Vancouver and BC. That means helping to feed people in our region, supporting the local economy and protecting our local environment and farmland for decades to come.

Along with providing us core funds, aka the “meat and potatoes” of our operations, the support of folks like yourself help us create thriving community spaces that serve as access points for healthy food, wellness education, neighbourhood arts and culture and social change.

cornHow we’ve grown

Vancouver Farmers Markets started out as East Vancouver Farmers Market, which descended upon eight skeptical farmers in the parking lot of the Croatian Cultural Centre. They sold out within a couple of hours. Word travelled quickly and the second week there were twice as many farmers and 800-1200 people were attending on a weekly basis. The market ran for 11 weeks and generated almost $40,000 in sales.

Now in our 20th year, Vancouver Farmers Markets operate nine weekly markets and host 425,000 people annually. Our markets support 250 small BC producers and help keep over 6,000 acres of farmland in production. Each year, VFM contributes more than $15 million in direct and indirect benefits to the local and regional economy.

Here’s how you can join the party

tomatoesYou don’t turn 20 everyday and we plan to celebrate this season with a series of 20th Anniversary events, contests, limited edition merchandise and festivities. Enter our #VFM20 photo contest on Instagram for your chance to win $100 in Market Money! Take a walk down memory lane with Moments in History panels at the markets and follow our #tbt and Founding Vendor profiles on our Market News blog. Become a Market Member during our 20th Anniversary Membership Drive. Check out our exclusive 20th Anniversary Market Merch, including the limited edition tee, handmade in BC cedar Market Crate and Market Tote Bag. See www.eatlocal.org

CSA box program

Community Supported Agriculture, often shortened to CSA, is a prepaid subscription to a farm’s produce for the season. Most CSAs give shareholders a weekly supply of veggies, herbs, fruits and sometimes even eggs and meat. You know it’s fresh and you get to meet the farm and people who grew your food. The prepaid CSA arrangements also make it a source of financial security for the farmer. Some CSAs also incorporate farm workdays for shareholders. Pickup days vary by farm and some offer pickups at a VFM location. A subscription to a CSA makes a great gift. For a list of vendors, see http://eatlocal.org/csa-box-program/ Contact them directly for more information.

Make a donation

In 2015, 50% of funds raised go directly to the Farmers Market Nutrition Coupon Program, with the goal to bring more low-income families and seniors to the markets. Donations of $20 or more receive the benefits of VFM Membership. Support us in our mission to create and nurture a local, sustainable and vibrant marketplace for our community, environment, and economy. Donate at eatlocal.org

Source: Vancouver Farmers Markets, www.eatlocal.org
For a list of farmers markets throughout BC and Alberta, see:
www.bcfarmersmarket.org
www.albertamarkets.com/markets

berry and tomato photos © James Boardman
corn photo © Alex Grichenko


 

Feast of Fields

Experience the harvest, gourmet style
UBC Farm, Sunday Sept 13, 1-5pm

This four-hour wandering harvest festival is Farm Folk City Folk’s (FFCF) annual fundraising event. With a wine glass and linen napkin in hand, you can taste the very best of BC from chefs, farmers, fishers, ranchers, food artisans, vintners, brewers, distillers and other beverage producers from across the province. Feast of Fields highlights the connections between farmer and chef, field and table, and farm folks and city folks. Feast of Fields is a gastronomic journey towards a sustainable, local food system. For tickets and other Feast of Fields locations, see www.farmfolkcityfolk.ca


 

2015 Farmers Market schedule

Main St Station
1100 Station Street,
Wednesdays, 2-6PM, to Oct 7.

Yaletown 
1200 Mainland St,
Thursdays, 2-6PM, to Oct 29.

Trout Lake 
Lakewood Drive and 13th Ave, Saturdays, 9AM-2PM, to Oct 24.

West End
Comox Street,
Saturdays, 9AM-2PM, to Oct 25.

Kerrisdale
5500 East Boulevard,
Saturdays, 10AM-2PM, to Oct 10.

Kitsilano
Kitsilano Community Centre, Larch Street,
Sundays, 10AM-2PM, to Oct 25.

Mt. Pleasant
2300 Guelph Street,
Sundays, 10AM-2PM, to Oct 11.

Winter Market
4601 Ontario Street,
Saturdays, 10AM-2PM, Nov to Apr.

Hastings Park 
Winter Market at the PNE:
Hastings Skatepark,
Renfrew Street,
Sundays, 10AM-2PM, Nov to Apr.

The market is about more than shopping. Enjoy weekly activities like the children’s area and face-painting as well as special events.

War is a racket

By Major General Smedley Butler (1881 – 1940)

 

portrait of Major General Smedley Butler• Smedley Darlington Butler was a United States Marine Corps Major General, the highest rank authorized at that time, and at the time of his death the most decorated Marine in US history. During his 34-year career as a Marine, he participated in military actions in the Philippines, China, Central America and the Caribbean during the Banana Wars and France in World War I. Butler is well known for having later become an outspoken critic of US wars and their consequences, as well as exposing the Business Plot, a plan to overthrow the US government. By the end of his career, Butler had received 16 medals, five for heroism. He is one of 19 men to receive the Medal of Honor twice and the only Marine to be awarded the Brevet Medal and two Medals of Honor, all for separate actions.

War is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.

A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small “inside” group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war, a few people make huge fortunes.

In the World War [I], a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows.

How many of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle? How many of them dug a trench? How many of them knew what it meant to go hungry in a rat-infested dug-out? How many of them spent sleepless, frightened nights, ducking shells and shrapnel and machine gun bullets? How many of them parried a bayonet thrust of an enemy? How many of them were wounded or killed in battle?

Out of war, nations acquire additional territory, if they are victorious. They just take it. This newly acquired territory promptly is exploited by the few – the self-same few who wrung dollars out of blood in the war. The general public shoulders the bill.

And what is this bill?

This bill renders a horrible accounting. Newly placed gravestones. Mangled bodies. Shattered minds. Broken hearts and homes. Economic instability. Depression and all its attendant miseries. Back-breaking taxation for generations and generations.

For a great many years, as a soldier, I had a suspicion that war was a racket; not until I retired to civil life did I fully realize it. Now that I see the international war clouds gathering, as they are today, I must face it and speak out.

Again, they are choosing sides. France and Russia met and agreed to stand side by side. Italy and Austria hurried to make a similar agreement. Poland and Germany cast sheep’s eyes at each other, forgetting for the nonce [one unique occasion] their dispute over the Polish Corridor.

The assassination of King Alexander of Jugoslavia [Yugoslavia] complicated matters. Jugoslavia and Hungary, long bitter enemies, were almost at each other’s throats. Italy was ready to jump in. But France was waiting. So was Czechoslovakia. All of them are looking ahead to war. Not the people – not those who fight and pay and die – only those who foment wars and remain safely at home to profit.

There are 40,000,000 men under arms in the world today and our statesmen and diplomats have the temerity to say that war is not in the making. Hell’s bells! Are these 40,000,000 men being trained to be dancers? Not in Italy, to be sure. Premier Mussolini knows what they are being trained for.

He, at least, is frank enough to speak out. Only the other day, Il Duce in International Conciliation, the publication of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said:

“And above all, Fascism, the more it considers and observes the future and the development of humanity quite apart from political considerations of the moment, believes neither in the possibility nor the utility of perpetual peace… War alone brings up to its highest tension all human energy and puts the stamp of nobility upon the people who have the courage to meet it.”

Marine Officers at Veracruz. Front row, left to right: Wendell C. Neville; John A. Lejeune; Littleton W. T. Waller, Commanding; Smedley Butler
Marine Officers at Veracruz. Front row, left to right: Wendell C. Neville; John A. Lejeune; Littleton W. T. Waller, Commanding; Smedley Butler

Undoubtedly, Mussolini means exactly what he says. His well-trained army, his great fleet of planes and even his navy are ready for war – anxious for it, apparently. His recent stand at the side of Hungary in the latter’s dispute with Jugoslavia showed that. And the hurried mobilization of his troops on the Austrian border after the assassination of Dollfuss showed it too. There are others in Europe, too, whose sabre rattling presages war, sooner or later.

Herr Hitler, with his re-arming Germany and his constant demands for more and more arms, is an equal if not greater menace to peace. France only recently increased the term of military service for its youth from a year to 18 months. Yes, all over, nations are camping in their arms. The mad dogs of Europe are on the loose. In the Orient, the maneuvering is more adroit. Back in 1904, when Russia and Japan fought, we kicked out our old friends the Russians and backed Japan. Then, our very generous international bankers were financing Japan. Now, the trend is to poison us against the Japanese. What does the “open door” policy to China mean to us? Our trade with China is about $90,000,000 a year. Or the Philippine Islands? We have spent about $600,000,000 in the Philippines in 35 years and we (our bankers and industrialists and speculators) have private investments there of less than $200,000,000.

Then, to save that China trade of about $90,000,000, or to protect these private investments of less than $200,000,000 in the Philippines, we would be all stirred up to hate Japan and go to war – a war that might well cost us tens of billions of dollars, hundreds of thousands of lives of Americans, and many more hundreds of thousands of physically maimed and mentally unbalanced men.

Of course, for this loss, there would be a compensating profit – fortunes would be made. Millions and billions of dollars would be piled up. By a few. Munitions makers. Bankers. Ship builders. Manufacturers. Meat packers. Speculators. They would fare well.

Yes, they are getting ready for another war. Why shouldn’t they? It pays high dividends.

But what does it profit the men who are killed? What does it profit their mothers and sisters, their wives and their sweethearts? What does it profit their children? What does it profit anyone except the very few to whom war means huge profits?

Yes, and what does it profit the nation?

Take our own case. Until 1898, we didn’t own a bit of territory outside the mainland of North America. At that time, our national debt was a little more than $1,000,000,000. Then we became “internationally minded.” We forgot, or shunted aside, the advice of the Father of our country. We forgot George Washington’s warning about “entangling alliances.” We went to war. We acquired outside territory. At the end of the World War period, as a direct result of our fiddling in international affairs, our national debt had jumped to over $25,000,000,000. Our total favourable trade balance during the 25-year period was about $24,000,000,000. Therefore, on a purely bookkeeping basis, we ran a little behind year for year and that foreign trade might well have been ours without the wars.

It would have been far cheaper (not to say safer) for the average American who pays the bills to stay out of foreign entanglements. For a very few, this racket, like bootlegging and other underworld rackets, brings fancy profits, but the cost of operations is always transferred to the people – who do not profit.

Excerpted from War Is a Racket, by United States Marine Corps Major General and two-time Medal of Honor recipient Smedley D. Butler.

Four keys to healthy aging

by Dr. Mercola

senior man and woman on a beach• If you had a choice and could either age well – enjoying your “golden years” with energy and vigour, free from disability and illness – or age poorly and be straddled with health issues that keep you from fully living the later years of your life, which would you choose?

You do actually have a choice or, at least, can choose to use strategies that will greatly sway your chances in one direction or the other. And I’m sure most everyone reading this would rather experience healthy aging than the alternative.

Research has found four key behaviours that lower your risk of disability, chronic disease and mental health problems as you age: 1) Not smoking. 2) Moderate drinking. 3) Exercising regularly (at least 2.5 hours a week of moderate activity or 1 hour a week of vigorous activity). 4) Eating vegetables and fruits daily.

Now here’s what’s interesting. While each of these was moderately beneficial on its own, increasing the odds of “successful aging” by up to 50 percent, the best rewards came from following all of themsimultaneously. Those who practised all four of these tripled their chances of avoiding disability and disease over a 16-year period and experienced good cognitive, mental, physical, respiratory and cardiovascular functioning. “Although individual healthy behaviours are moderately associated with successful aging, their combined impact is substantial,” the researchers said.

Six additional healthy aging strategies

The bottom line is the more healthy habits you embrace, the higher your chances of aging successfully become. And while the strategies listed above are all important, there are several others I believe can benefit most people greatly as well.

1. Avoid sugar/fructose: Limiting sugar in your diet is a well-known key to longevity. Of all the molecules capable of inflicting damage in your body, sugar molecules are probably the most damaging. Fructose, in particular, is an extremely potent pro-inflammatory agent that creates toxic advanced glycation end products (AGEs), which are associated with the development of chronic degenerative diseases associated with aging.

Excess fructose consumption also promotes the kind of dangerous growth of fat cells around your vital organs that are the hallmark of diabetes and heart disease. In one study, 16 volunteers who ate high levels of fructose produced new fat cells around their heart, liver and other digestive organs in just 10 weeks.

Sugar/fructose also increases your insulin and leptin levels and decreases receptor sensitivity for both of these vital hormones and this is another major factor in premature aging and age-related chronic degenerative diseases such as heart disease and diabetes. Keep in mind that while it’s perfectly normal for your blood sugar levels to rise slightly after every meal, it is not natural or healthy when your blood sugar levels become excessively elevated and stay that way.

Unfortunately, that’s exactly what will happen if you’re eating like the average American, who consumes a staggering 2.5 pounds of sugar a week on average. And when you add in other low-quality carb foods such as pastries, cookies, candy and starchy “complex carbs” such as bread and pasta, which also break down to sugar (glucose) in your body, it’s not so difficult to see why so many Americans are in such poor health.

Further, according to professor Cynthia Kenyon, whom many experts believe should win the Nobel Prize for her research into aging, carbohydrates (glucose) directly affect the genes that govern youthfulness and longevity. So you may actually be able to extend your life and stay fit throughout your old age with a simple dietary change that switches on your “youth” gene.

Kenyon’s research with C. elegans roundworms showed that decreased carb intake can lead to significant life extension and improved long-term health. One of the most interesting details of her findings is that not only did the roundworms live up to six times longer than normal, but they kept their health and youthful vigour until the end – and isn’t that what “healthy aging” is really all about?

As a standard recommendation, I strongly advise keeping your total fructose consumption below 25 grams per day. However, most people would be wise to limit their fructose to 15 grams or less, particularly if you have elevated uric acid levels, which can be used as an indicator of fructose toxicity.

2. High intensity “anti-aging” exercise: Even if you’re eating the healthiest diet in the world, you still need to exercise to reach the highest levels of health and you need to be exercising effectively, which means including high-intensity activities into your rotation. A study published in the journal Mechanisms of Aging and Developmentconfirmed the “anti-aging” effect of high-intensity training, such as Peak Fitness. High-intensity interval-type training also gives a natural boost to your human growth hormone (HGH) production, which is essential for optimal health, strength and vigour.

3. Stress reduction and positive thinking: You cannot be optimally healthy if you avoid addressing the emotional component of your health and longevity, as your emotional state plays a role in nearly every physical disease – from heart disease and depression to arthritis and cancer. It’s simply no coincidence that many centenarians mention positive thought and emotional wellness in their advice on how to stay healthy. As 114-year-old Walter Breuning said before his death, “Tell yourself that every day is a good day and make it that way.”

Effective coping mechanisms are a major longevity-promoting factor, in part because stress has a direct impact on inflammation which, in turn, underlies many of the chronic diseases that kill people prematurely every day. Meditation, prayer, social support and exercise are all viable options that can help you maintain emotional and mental equilibrium.

4. Take high-quality animal-based omega-3 fats: Animal-based omega-3 fat is a strong factor in helping people live longer and many experts believe it is likely the predominant reason why the Japanese are the longest lived race on the planet (as their diets are naturally high in omega-3s). In the US, many are deficient in omega-3 fats.

According to Dr. William Harris, an expert on omega-3 fats, those who have an omega-3 index of less than four percent age much faster than those with indexes above eight percent. Therefore, your omega-3 index may also be an effective marker of your rate of aging.

5. Optimize your vitamin D levels: In one study of more than 2,000 women, those with higher vitamin D levels were found to have fewer aging-related changes in their DNA, as well as lowered inflammatory responses. Additionally, people with low levels of vitamin D have been found more likely to have diabetes, high blood pressure and diseased heart muscle and are three times more likely to die [prematurely] from any cause compared to those with normal levels.

We have long known it is best to get your vitamin D from sun exposure and if at all possible, I strongly urge you to make sure you’re getting out in the sun on a daily basis. If you can’t get out in the sun, a safe tanning bed is the next best option. It is also important to make sure you get enough vitamin K2 to balance your vitamin D levels. The best way to get the vitamin K2 is from fermented vegetables that are created from special starter cultures that use bacteria that make vitamin K2.

6. Intermittent fasting: There’s a growing body of research showing that fasting has a beneficial impact on longevity in animals. There are a number of mechanisms contributing to this effect. Normalizing insulin sensitivity is a major one as insulin sensitivity is critical for the activation of the mTOR pathway, which plays an important part in repairing and regenerating your tissues, including your muscles, thereby counteracting the aging process. The fact that it improves a number of potent disease markers indicates that fasting can have an overall beneficial effect on your general health. For example, modern science has confirmed fasting can help you: Normalize your insulin sensitivity, which is key for optimal health as insulin resistance (which is what you get when your insulin sensitivity plummets) is a primary contributing factor to nearly all chronic disease, from diabetes to heart disease and even cancer; normalize ghrelin levels, also known as “the hunger hormone”; promote human growth hormone (HGH) production, which plays an important part in health, fitness and slowing the aging process; lower triglyceride levels; reduce inflammation and lessen free radical damage.

On intermittent fasting, the longest time you’ll ever abstain from food is 36 hours, although 14-18 hours is more common. You can also opt to simply delay eating, for example skipping breakfast, or stop eating earlier in the day. The issue of fasting is a major shift from my typical recommendations. I’ve not been a major advocate for it in the past, but… I am always learning. To that end, I’ve now revised my personal eating schedule to eliminate breakfast and restrict the time I eat food to a period of about six to seven hours each day, which is typically from noon to 6 or 7PM.

One caveat: the same genes that promote human longevity also appear to suppress female reproductive capacity. Hence, fasting and intense exercise protocols, both known to promote longevity, also lower estrogen levels, thereby modulating body composition in women and suppressing female reproductive capacity. So this may not be an ideal strategy for women of reproductive age who wish to have children.

Healthy aging is a “package deal”

DrMercola There is no “quick fix” or magic bullet when it comes to aging well. Generally speaking, the better you treat your body throughout your life, the better your aging experience will be. Most people do not revel in the thought of getting older because for many “aging” is synonymous with aches and pains, forgetfulness and loneliness. It certainly is inevitable that you’re going to get older, but I can tell you from personal experience that this does not have to be a bad thing.

Now, in my late 50s, I am the fittest I have ever been in my life and I also live out every day to its fullest potential. I may have been able to run faster when I was younger, but I would never trade that for the muscle strength, flexibility and knowledge that I have today. You too can achieve wellness on both physical and mental fronts and you can do so at any age. In fact, in many respects, life only continues to get better as the years go by.


© Dr. Mercola. For more research information, visit www.mercola.com

beach photo © Monkey Business Images

How media disappears bad news about HPV vaccines

Where have all the guinea pigs gone?

Some healthcare professionals see this as a serious problem

• DRUG BUST by Alan Cassels

PhotoHeadshotAlanCassels • Anyone who discusses vaccines needs to put their perspectives right up front. Here are mine: polarized positions and extreme views are not helpful. Burying inconvenient truths is not helpful. Nor is accusing people of being anti-vaxxers or pharma shills.

Yet I have found that polarized positions dominate mainstream media articles about controversial vaccines – sold as Gardasil and Cervarix – that are supposed to protect people from the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV). That’s unfortunate because it prevents in-depth discussions of the benefits and harms related to the HPV vaccine.

There is one indisputable fact about the nine-year old HPV vaccine: we still have no proof it prevents cervical cancer as claimed. It might take 15 or 20 years to develop cervical cancer after being exposed to HPV so there is simply no body of evidence it has prevented a single case of cancer. Yet many reasonable, thoughtful people posing genuine questions about HPV vaccine safety are systematically shut down.

There seems to be a concerted effort to hide the bad news about the HPV vaccines. Despite numerous reports being gathered around the world of girls suffering autoimmune disorders and other adverse effects following inoculation, almost everywhere medical authorities deny the vaccine could hurt people – some irreversibly so.

For me, this is the headscratcher: can we really believe that the thousands of girls around the globe blaming the HPV vaccine for their inexplicable illnesses are doing so because they have a personal vendetta against the pharmaceutical industry?

Mainstream media is contributing in a very nefarious way: they are making the bad news disappear. Back in August of 2007, Maclean’s Magazine printed a lengthy story on Gardasil titled “Our Girls Are Not Guinea Pigs” with the subtitle, “Is an upcoming mass inoculation of a generation unnecessary and potentially dangerous?” It was a provocative story at the time when Gardasil was still new and controversies swirled around its safety, how it was studied, approved and covered by governments. Today, you won’t find that story on Maclean’s website, or anywhere: Those “Guinea Pigs” have been disappeared.

Fast-forward to February of this year when the Toronto Star, Canada’s largest newspaper, ran a front-page story on the HPV vaccine called “A Wonder Drug’s Dark Side.” It began with, “A Star investigation has found that since 2008, at least 60 Canadians have experienced debilitating illnesses after inoculation. Patients and parents say the incidents point to the importance of full disclosure of risks.” The essence of this story was solid: girls were apparently being injured by a vaccine they were told would save them from cervical cancer.

A fierce counter-attack soon ensued. The Star was accused of being sensationalistic, anti-science and fear mongering. Complaints abounded, apologies were made and then astonishingly, the story was retracted. Disappeared from the Internet. If you search for it, you won’t find it. Instead, you’ll find a fawning opinion piece signed by about 60 physicians and infectious disease experts declaring the Star’s “Dark Side” story was irresponsible because “study after study has shown there is no causal link between the events the Star reported and the vaccine.”

The Star referred to 60 events related to the HPV vaccine, but is that the whole story? Sadly, finding out how many vaccine adverse events Canadians suffer from is difficult because Canada runs a dual reporting system. Most adverse events are held by the Public Health Agency of Canada, only accessible by access to information requests. (I’ll write more about this in the future).

Looking south, up to May, 2015, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting (VAER) system in the US has recorded 39,390 adverse events linked to the HPV vaccine and 228 deaths. Remember, these are ‘associations,’ not causation. The vaccine was a suspected cause in these adverse events, but given the nature of adverse event reporting, we can never be sure; one might say there might be up to 3,930 HPV vaccine-related adverse events in Canada.

Experts almost always call adverse events reports made to regulators ‘anecdotal,’ but does that mean we ignore them altogether? Last month,La Revue Prescrire, a French source of independent and critical drug information, published an extensive review of the HPV vaccine and concluded that, although there was no firm evidence of serious harm, regulators around the world have received reports of unexplained fatigue, muscle pain, tachycardia, irritability, confusion and amnesia, as well as more serious seizures, stroke and multiple sclerosis associated with, but probably not caused by, the HPV vaccine.

Can journalists write stories of real-live people and HPV vaccine injury without being accused of fear mongering or being anti-science? Apparently not, according to Toronto journalist Lawrence Solomon who claims there is a strict “media blackout” on vaccine safety stories, a fact he discovered when he tried to report on the measles vaccine. Unable to cast any doubt on the safety of vaccines, Mr. Solomon started his own website (www.vaccinefactcheck.org) and contends that discussing vaccine safety in the English speaking media is “basically taboo.”

This situation was reflected too in my interviews with two women who live in Winlaw, BC. Edda West and Nelle Maxey are members of Vaccine Choice Canada (www.vaccinechoicecanada.com) and both are activists trying to promote vaccine safety. They come to the issue for deeply personal reasons. Edda’s daughter had a severe vaccine reaction back in 1977 and Nelle’s niece was injured by the DPT vaccine.

Having followed issues of vaccine safety for more than 30 years, Edda asserts, “We’re real human beings who are trying to speak of our concerns and our voices are being silenced. We both have family members who have suffered harm from vaccines – we’re mothers, grandmothers, we’ve lived through the gamut. I have never said I’m against vaccines. I want people to make an informed decision about vaccines.”

“So,” I asked them, “why is the mainstream media only giving one side of the HPV vaccine story?

Edda said, “Clearly, the media has been co-opted and paralyzed by ‘consensus science.’” Nelle uses the term “perception management,” referring to a concerted campaign to create the appearance there is no controversy over the HPV vaccine. She knows of many journalists around the globe who are being attacked and silenced for reporting on the experiences of those who have suffered vaccine-related injuries. She tells me she doesn’t feel alone. “We have lots of vaccine allies,” she says.

One of those allies is Freda Birell of Sanevax (www.sanevax.org), an organization devoted to producing quality information about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. Their website has links to dozens of sites around the world, all united in the belief their daughters have been harmed by the HPV vaccine.

When I asked Freda why the media is so reluctant to report on the safety of the HPV vaccines she wrote back, “The media personnel I have talked to say one of two things: either the pharmaceutical companies threaten the media outlet with pulling their advertising or the health authorities contact them to ‘inform’ them that any press about vaccine risks will damage vaccine uptake and endanger the public health.”

So I’m back to the same question: “Why is it so hard for the mainstream media to discuss – even if they are rare – problems related to the HPV vaccine?”

It’s a rhetorical question I try to answer myself. With over 300 vaccines in development right now, the pharmaceutical industry and others who are invested – professionally and economically – in developing and marketing these products can’t afford for the first “cancer vaccine” to fail. They’ve got too much riding on it. If the cancer vaccine paradigm – represented by the HPV vaccine – has problems, you have to do what you need to do, even if that means you keep burying the guinea pigs.

Alan Cassels is a drug policy researcher at the University of Victoria. He writes about medical screening and drugs, consults with unions on drug benefits plans and is helping research tools to make deprescribing easier for physicians. You can read more of his writings atwww.alancassels.com or follow him on twitter @akecassels

A call to modernize food labelling

Food labelling needs modernization

• plant-based products currently face discrimination

 

CashewCheese
Zengarry Vegetarian Cuisine’s Brie-style cashew cheese. Zengarry was ordered by CFIA to change its business and product name so it did not include the protected word “cheese.”

The Plant Foods Council, a national trade association promoting and protecting the interests of plant food manufacturers in Canada, is calling for changes to food regulations that discriminate against vegan products similar to traditional animal products such as meats, milks, cheeses and butters.

The Plant Foods Council is also seeking an end to the recent and disproportionate targeting of plant-based companies and manufacturers by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA).

The CFIA recently targeted Zengarry Vegetarian Cuisine (www.zengarry.com), a small Ontario company specializing in artisanal dairy-free, cashew-based cheese. Zengarry clearly labels its products as “cashew cheese” and “dairy-free.” Zengarry was ordered by CFIA to change its business and product name so it did not include the protected word “cheese,” claiming that cheese must be made from animal milk and the term “cashew cheese” would mislead consumers.

Meanwhile, other protected words like “milk” and “butter” are commonly used on labels for peanut butter, almond butter and coconut milk without confusion. The CFIA has not attempted to enforce labelling regulations against such products for use of protected words and appears to be singling out Zengarry.

“Plant-based products like grain meats, vegan cheeses and soy milks have long been pervasive in the Canadian market place. Food labelling regulations that prohibit calling a product “cashew cheese” or “soy milk” are out of step with the way consumers think about and refer to these foods. Health Canada and the CFIA must take immediate steps to modernize labelling regulations to reflect this reality and end the discrimination against plant-based foods,” says Camille Labchuk, a director of the Plant Foods Council.

This is not the first time a plant-based manufacturer has been singled out. In 2014, the CFIA forced Seattle-based Field Roast, which makes vegan grain meats, out of the Canadian marketplace. The company was required to reformulate its products to mimic the nutritional profile of animal meat, a long and expensive process.

The Plant Foods Council is asking Health Canada and the CFIA to amend regulations to:

  • Recognize and regulate the term “vegan” as a descriptor of plant-based products.
  • Allow the use of terms like “cheese,” “milk” and “butter” to describe plant-based products.
  • Remove the requirement that plant-based meats must have the same nutritional profile as animal meats.

Source: www.plantfoodscouncil.org The Plant Foods Council protects and promotes the interests of plant food manufacturers in Canada and educates the public about eating plant-based foods.

Nelson’s co-op model thrives

view of lake and bridge near Nelson
Kootenay Lake at Nelson (above) and a model of the Nelson Commons housing and commercial development (below).

In recent years, the concept of social enterprise has garnered growing attention among the progressive community, as if it were some newly discovered approach to business that could help redirect the delivery of goods and services while serving the common good. Turns out this old wine in new bottles has not only been around for some time, but it has been active in our midst.

On first thought, it might be a stretch to think of co-operatives as the original social enterprise, but it is not such a huge stretch if one looks at Western economic structures over the last 200 years. Of course, it would be negligent to not acknowledge that, for most of history, the principle of co-operation has been the cultural norm for many indigenous cultures. As capitalism gradually became the prevailing economic paradigm for Europe and then the “New World,” self reliance and the law of comparative advantage – so-called “free trade” – steadily took hold. Having just harnessed the first fossil fuel (coal) and possessing seemingly unlimited natural resources, it was not surprising that people embraced this new economic model as a panacea for many woes that had plagued humanity for generations.

However, as we know, genies are never easily coaxed back into the bottle and earlier iterations of capitalism have morphed into the hyper capitalism we have today; it is hard to ignore the necessity for alternatives that can provide the goods and services we require without destroying the life systems upon which we depend. Hence, the surge in new social enterprises.

Nelson Commons ProjectWikipedia defines a “social enterprise” as “an organization that applies commercial strategies to maximize improvements in human and environmental well-being, rather than maximizing profits for external shareholders.”

This was clearly the case in 1844 when the Rochdale Society of Equitable Pioneers in Rochdale, England, created what is considered to be the first successful cooperative enterprise and it has since been used as a model for modern co-ops, following the seven Rochdale Principles that include:

Self-help: In co-operatives, people help each other whilst helping themselves by working together for mutual benefit.

Self-responsibility: Individuals within co-operatives act responsibly and play a full part in the organization.

Democracy: A co-operative will be structured so that members have control over the organization – one member, one vote.

Equality: Each member will have equal rights and benefits according to their contribution.

Equity: Members will be treated justly and fairly.

Solidarity: Members will support each other and other co-operatives.

Today, nearly 200 years later, here in BC we have many thriving co-operative enterprises. Two that stand out are Vancity and Mountain Equipment Co-op. MEC, as it is more commonly called – started in 1971 when a small group of west coast outdoor enthusiasts decided to create a retail business in a less conventional way and chose the co-op model. Forty-four years later – and with a membership of 3.3 million across Canada (10% of the population) – MEC stands out as an enterprise that provides exceptional products and service while providing generous support to a myriad of non-profits, particularly in the environmental realm.

And, of course, BC wouldn’t be the same were it not for Vancity which, with its 58 branches, holds the status as Canada’s largest community credit union. Vancity uses its $18.6 billion in assets to help improve the financial well-being of its members while, at the same time, helping to develop healthy communities that are socially, economically and environmentally sustainable. The range of support Vancity provides to all manner of progressive initiatives in our region is inspiring and exemplifies the benefits that can accrue when one focuses on the “commons.”

Tucked away in the southeast corner of our province is Nelson, the “Queen City” of the Kootenays and a beehive of co-ops. The city even boasts a co-op of co-ops – the Upper Columbia Co-op Council – offering a place where ideas and strategies can be shared. Unknown to most, Nelson boasts Canada’s largest member-owned natural foods co-operative with over 13,000 members. Bursting at the seams, the Kootenay Co-op had been looking for a new home for a number of years before securing a prime property in the heart of downtown that had been the home of a Super Valu come Extra Foods.

As a long time resident of the area, Russell Precious, who had grown Capers into an iconic Vancouver food destination in the 80s and 90s, teamed up with the Co-op to explore developing the site into a mixed-use project; it would include a new 20,000-square-foot co-op, 10,000 square feet of additional commercial space and 54 residential condominiums above.

In the process of determining the feasibility of the project, Russell’s long- time friend Keith Jardine introduced him to Andy Broderick, the VP of Community Investment at Vancity. The two of them struck it off and initiated a partnership that exemplifies the Rochdale Principle: “solidarity” or co-ops helping co-ops.

“When I was first approached, I thought it was a bit unusual and certainly audacious for a relatively small food co-op to initiate a project of this scale; perhaps that’s what got my attention” Andy recalls. “The Kootenay Co-op has done their homework and have brought together a recognized group of professionals to pull this off and this can serve as a prototype for other co-ops to think bigger.” After nearly four years of planning, the project is now well underway with 70% of both the commercial and residential units spoken for with completion scheduled for the summer of 2016.

Russell himself made the choice to settle in Nelson in 1987 even though it meant a lot of commuting back and forth to Vancouver during the Capers years. “I’ve always been a bit surprised how easily people get stuck in our large urban centres without really stepping back and looking at other options. Nelson has always been an epicentre of progressive activity – both political and cultural – as well as being located in one of the most beautiful corners of BC. We were looking for the best place to raise a family and have easy access to wilderness.”

It is not surprising the Nelson Commons project would take root in a place like Nelson as a social enterprise. If co-ops and other social enterprises are to have a significant impact in shifting to a more benign form of commerce like MEC and Vancity, they will need to scale up and take a more prominent role in our economy.

Today, we hear a growing plethora of voices who recognize this trend could lead to the unravelling of civil society as we know it. Paradoxically, this great theft of wealth from the “commons,” if left unchallenged, will pull the rug out from under the feet of the thieves themselves. The co-op model as the original social enterprise offers one antidote to an economy that has lost its moral compass.

Nelson Commons still has a good selection of two and three-bedroom units available. Scheduled completion is summer 2016. For more information, visit www.nelsoncommons.ca

The evolution of an activist

by Lorisa Schouela

Lorisa Schouela• One day last July, my life took a decisive turn. The day began much like any other summer Sunday; I ate breakfast and headed to the Kitsilano farmer’s market hauling a bucket of compost.

At the entrance to the market, an organizer for Dogwood Initiative, a local grassroots organization, approached me with a petition against the expansion of coal transport through the Fraser-Surrey Docks.

Signing the petition was easy enough, but when the Dogwood representative asked if I would actively get involved in the coal campaign, I pulled back. Did I really want to be invaded with an avalanche of emails and phone calls? I have always regarded my privacy as sacrosanct.

“Yes,” I said, surprising myself, but I honestly didn’t think I’d ever hear from her again. A couple of weeks later when I met the young woman from Dogwood, I felt excited and nervous – excited at the opportunity to get involved but nervous because this was way out of my comfort zone.

Becoming more aware has been a gradual process, an evolution in the way I think and act in the world. The first tentative steps involved making certain key choices: becoming a more aware consumer, supporting a credit union rather than a conventional bank, eating organic and vegetarian, using transit whenever possible and recycling. For a while, that felt good enough.

As time progressed, I saw the desecration of the environment accelerate at a breathtaking rate: carbon emissions ballooned, natural habitats vanished, many fish and wildlife species disappeared, plans to extend pipelines from coast to coast continued unabated, tanker traffic multiplied and environmental legislation was gutted. It was becoming evident our government’s strategy was one of putting commercial profits before people.

Watching helplessly from the sidelines became unbearable. As a lover of the Earth, animals and children and as a mother and grandmother, I felt a deep urgency to protect what I love.

I became active in Dogwood’s coal initiative to stop the proposed export of eight million metric tons of US thermal coal per year, which would travel by rail to the Fraser-Surrey Docks terminal at which point it would be transferred to gigantic ocean barges bound for Asian markets.

The current proposal to ship massive amounts of coal from Fraser-Surrey Docks down the Fraser River, through the Straits of Georgia and past the Gulf Islands to be burned in Asia would not only compromise the air, crops, waterways and fisheries at home, but it would also accelerate the global climate crisis as the atmospheric impact of burning coal is the same no matter where it’s burned.

The scheme to massively scale-up exports of fossil fuels has met with fierce opposition from communities on both sides of the border that are directly affected by the noise and pollution of the coal trains. A cross-border movement has emerged as people see themselves not as separated by a border, but as a West Coast bloc mobilizing to protect the same land and waterway.

As the battle to protect our air, land and water heats up, alliances are being forged between Native and non-Native groups, as both sides discover the potential benefits of working together in a common cause.

The “divide and rule” strategy no longer works. Outraged at having no say in projects that affect their health, safety and environment, young and old, native and non native, Americans and Canadians, are uniting. There is a new fighting spirit at play and it seems to be spreading with each advancing challenge.

My hope is that more people will awaken to the urgency of mobilizing as an organized and united force to say “No” to coal trains, to poisons polluting our air, land and water and to the expansion of fossil fuel frontiers.

If you’ve been sitting helplessly on the sidelines and want to exercise your right to say “No,” there are many local grassroots organizations you can contact such as dogwoodinitiative.org, Leadnow.ca or fairvotingbc.ca for people-powered change.

Lorisa Schouela is interested in providing educational opportunities to under-served populations. She is currently involved in a Rose Charity educational project in Uganda. Lorisa offers end-of-life care as a volunteer at Granville Hospice.

Democracy in Canada

Don Davies in front of Pariiament

Some modest proposals

by Don Davies

Don Davies in front of Pariiament
Don Davies is the Member of Parliament for Vancouver Kingsway. He was first elected in 2008 and was re-elected in 2011.

• Like few others, the last decade in Canadian politics has exposed serious deficiencies in Canadian democracy.

Parliament was prorogued by a Prime Minister afraid of losing a confidence vote in the House of Commons.

An unelected Senate has generated scores of scandals, ranging from allegations of bribery, to fraud, to reports doctored on orders from the PMO. MPs have lost their seats because of electoral cheating and parties have been found guilty of serious violations of theElections Act.

Government backbenchers have been muzzled, communications have been centralized and Canadian policy has been driven by a Prime Minister wholly uninterested in compromise, or even hearing a diversity of views.

That Canadian democracy is under challenge is a point acknowledged on all sides of Parliament.

MPs from several caucuses have left their parties to sit as independents. Conservative backbenchers have publicly defied their Prime Minister to raise issues he has expressly forbidden and one, Michael Chong, has proposed legislation that, at least, tries to loosen the strict rule imposed upon them.

Having served as MP for Vancouver Kingsway for the last seven years, I have identified three initiatives I think would go some distance in making Parliament more democratic for its members and more accountable to the citizens we are elected to represent.

First, I believe we must loosen the anachronistic grip of confidence when it comes to government legislation and the consequences of a lost vote. By doing so, we can hold more free votes, which I fervently believe most Canadians want. At the same time, we can increase the influence of individual MPs and spur more consultation about legislation.

At present, our system runs by a centuries-old convention that says a government must fall, and an election called, if a government loses a vote on a money bill or an explicit matter of confidence. This results in “whipped” votes where every member of the government must vote for a government bill, no matter how odious they find it or how opposed their constituents may be to it. This, in turn, engenders a similar reaction in opposition parties, who, for their part, are whipped into opposing the government legislation. Through continuous, unexamined repetition, whipped votes are now the norm and are applied to many other issues that involve neither money nor confidence.

To fix this, I propose we amend our system to permit free votes on all bills, government or not, except for on an explicit vote of confidence itself. If a regular bill is defeated, it is just that; it is defeated and does not lead to the unnecessary and expensive step of an election to resolve the impasse. This would simply send a message to the government that its bill does not enjoy the support of the majority of the House and it must consult those who disagree and amend it sufficiently to garner the support it needs to pass.

I believe most Canadians want their elected representatives to feel freer to vote according to their commitments, consciences and electorates’ wishes – and not by the dictates of their Party’s whips. At the same time, we can preserve the option of defeating a government on an explicit motion to do so.

Second, I suggest the power to prorogue Parliament be taken away from the Prime Minister and instead require the agreement of a majority of MPs in the House of Commons.

In a modern democracy, it is frankly preposterous that the power to determine if a nation’s Parliament sits – or not – is held at the whim of one person. Indeed, it is not an overstatement to say such a power wielded by one person is more typical of a dictatorship than a representative system of government.

If there is a good reason to prorogue Parliament, than let the Prime Minister make that case to the House of Commons and obtain the consent of a majority of the members. Certainly, if such a system had been in place in 2008, Prime Minister Harper would not have been able to avoid facing the House of Commons with members who were prepared to vote a lack of confidence in his government and replace it with a coalition that enjoyed the support of a majority of MPs.

Finally, I believe that we must make fixed election dates an ironclad reality in Canada. Even though we technically have fixed election dates (namely, the October in the fourth year following the year of an election), the legislation contains a loophole that effectively allows a Prime Minister to call an election whenever he or she feels like it.

That is exactly what Prime Minister Harper did in 2008 when he called a snap election for October of that year even though it was not scheduled until 2010. Speculation was also rampant this year that Mr. Harper might call a spring election in another attempt to catch other parties off guard.

It is patently unfair for one party – the governing one, at that, who has so many institutional advantages – to be able to manipulate the timing of an election and become prepared for it in advance of the other parties. It is like one runner in the race being able to fire off the starter’s pistol and it skews the level playing field a democracy is supposed to ensure.

Many other initiatives are necessary to improve the health of Canadian democracy.

We should abolish unelected Senate, implement proportional representation and make floor-crossing MPs accountable to their electorates. We need to implement creative solutions to get more women, youth and minorities elected so our legislative bodies reflect the actual realities of our society. We must find ways to share power more effectively and better ensure that varying perspectives can make their way into the legislative process.

In the meantime, however, the above-mentioned three initiatives can be implemented swiftly and without excessive disagreement.

Democracy is supposed to be a living, breathing concept. It should be constantly examined and unceasingly improved.

Let’s get started.

www.dondavies.ca

Canada’s wrong turn on terrorism

by Anthony James Hall

Anti-Terrorism Act• The ascent of the Canadian police state through the passage of Bill C-51 has raised the stakes in the coming federal election. The vote is shaping up as a kind of referendum on whether or not Canadians will grant free reign to Harper’s open-ended crusade against anticipated “terrorism.” Many Canadians are realizing that, if we continue down the treacherous path charted by C-51, we shall certainly descend into a Dark Ages of Canadian fascism.

Star constitutional lawyer Rocco Galati has emphasized this danger. Recently, he charged that Bill C-51 replicates the legislative enablers of fascism ushered into law in Germany and Italy in the 1930s. He warns this new law will make Canada’s security police, CSIS, a “modern-day Gestapo,” unhinged from any significant oversight or democratic accountability.

Those overtly or covertly ensnared in C-51’s expanded web of police powers will lose all protections under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Canadians will forfeit yet more rights of personal privacy together with our liberties of expression, thought, association, assembly and movement. Similarly, the offending law subordinates the protections of the existing criminal justice system to the claimed imperatives of anti-terrorism. No longer can Canadians rely on the protections entrenched in the principle that citizens are innocent until proven guilty through due process in a court of law.

The words, “terrorist,” “terrorism” and “act of terror” have, for a long time, been purposely paired with especially horrific imagery engineered in the mainstream media to evoke trauma and repulsion. We are never given a credible explanation, however, of where and how criminal activity became the stuff of something bigger and worse. The very name “Global War on Terror” encapsulates the core deception of our time. The quintessence of terror is war. It makes no sense to subdue terror by fighting it with wars.

In this post-Cold War era, the dominant empire’s war on communism was replaced by the war on terrorism, with the Islamic world now cast as the demonized “enemies of the West.” The concept of terrorism is thus spun and sold to us in ways that distort and misrepresent the truth of what is really going on in the most intense psychological operation of our time. As a result, the vocabulary of terrorism is much too subjective, torqued and propagandistic to form a reliable basis for permanent institutions and viable laws.

The subordination of our criminal law beneath the growing edifice of “terrorist law” is a stealthy process integral to creeping fascism. If we pull back the curtain of deception, we see the imagery of terrorism has been contrived to advance a number of interests and agendas essential to maintaining the permanent war economy. The political economy of war puts lethal darkness at the heart of our corporate culture. How much longer can we survive our dependency on an unsustainable life support system that feeds on death and destruction of our natural world?

It is especially instructive that those who have taken the lead in rebranding the seemingly endless Global War on Terror are the architects and political overlords of the most terrifying intertwining of military, police, banking and media power ever orchestrated in world history. We are now experiencing the realization of the very dangers identified by former US President Eisenhower in 1961 when he warned us to beware of the military-industrial complex.

Is Canada protected from police state tyranny?

Although Bill C-51 has already been passed into law as the Anti-Terrorism Act 2015, the political status of Harper’s initiative still rides on the outcome of the next federal election. As the non-partisan constitutional expert Rocco Galati has emphasized, any parliamentarian or candidate of a political party that voted for this fascist legislation does not deserve a Canadian citizen’s vote. Since Justin Trudeau and all his MPS voted to pass Bill C-51, the implication of Galati’s advice is that the Liberals disqualified themselves as serious contenders to replace the Harper government.

No matter the outcome of the next federal election, however, the harsh reality is Canadians are already experiencing the police state tyranny Harper has now formalized with his anti-terrorist enactment. The passage of Bill C-51 now codifies and amplifies existing patterns that have long been allowed to erode protections for the human rights of Canadians. Beginning especially in the 1980s, the protections we once expected from governments have been steadily drained away through the process of “deregulation.” In strategic areas like banking, stock markets, security, public health, pharmaceuticals, food safety and the environment, corporate leviathans became self-regulating like the fox guarding the henhouse.

Here in Alberta, for instance, the current regulator of the oil and gas sector is 100% financed and directed by the industry itself. Likewise, such conflict of interest has become the rule rather than the exception in the field of public health. A former employee of Health Canada, Shiv Chopra has emerged as one of Canada’s most compelling eyewitnesses to the sacrifice of the public interest and common good. In his book,Corrupt to the Core, Chopra details the steady subordination of his former federal employer to transnational companies whose products are subject to federal approval.

In Neil Young’s new album, The Monsanto Years, words and music are put to many of the current assaults to the planet that go far beyond Monsanto’s flooding of our farmlands with cancer-causing glyphosate euphemistically labelled Roundup. The mounting evidence of the weaponization of our food, air and water puts the onus on all of us to do our own research, testing and regulation to do the best we can to protect ourselves from exposure to toxic hazards.

Indeed, the evidence continues to expose our governments as the primary sources and enablers of the very dangers we entrust them to protect us against. The poisoning of our biological, mental and political environment to fuel the war economy is especially insidious in the seemingly endless Global War on Terror.

Who are the real terrorists?

As Canadians, we are encouraged to believe we are among the most free, democratic and protected citizens on Earth. We pride ourselves on our input into an impressive array of international treaties, covenants and declarations designed to protect the most basic human rights. The shocking truth, however, is that these international legal instruments are rarely implemented or enforced. This failure of enforcement conceals the erroneous perception that universal human rights are especially well protected here.

The freedoms our Western societies are supposed to epitomize, but do not, are then presented back to us as the alleged basis of “Islamic contempt.” The notion of Islamic “hatred of our freedoms” was deliberately channelled into a psychological campaign to incite and exploit religious antagonisms. This strategy put a new face on the enemy that was necessary to perpetuate the war economy. The imagery of a Western call to arms in this anti-Muslim crusade is invoked by the repeated use of words like “jihad,” “infidels,” “radicalization” and “terrorism.” The term “lone-wolf terrorist” illustrates how the masterminds of this propaganda deploy words and imagery that play on our most deep-seated childhood fears.

In Canada, Harper’s new Anti-Terrorism Act creates the impression Canadians are receiving added protections from the “Islamic menace” and from other possible threats to our “national security.” The deeper reality is this fascist legislation formalizes the stripping away of our most basic protections that have emerged from centuries of hard-won democratic evolution.

The international system of justice is not entirely moribund. On rare occasions, international criminal law is implemented in UN courts to bring war criminals to justice. Consistently, however, the criminal proceedings are directed at those on the losing side of conflict. Never are the war criminals on the winning side brought to justice. They are protected members of a ruling cabal that puts itself above the law. Its great wealth and power without accountability locates these reckless racketeers at ground zero of the most ruthless and dangerous forms of terror the world has ever known.

Anthony Hall is professor of Globalization Studies at the University of Lethbridge. He has written for the Globe and Mail, the Toronto Star, Canadian Dimension and many other periodicals. His most recent books are Earth Into Property: Colonization, Decolonization and Capitalism and The American Empire and the Fourth World.