Celebrate the wisdom of elders, artists and visionaries

You are invited to a historic reconciliation gathering at the Queen Elizabeth Theatre, April 22, 2016

 

Chief Robert Joseph Ambassador for Reconciliation Canada and Hereditary Chief of the Gwawaenuk First Nation.
Chief Robert Joseph
Ambassador for Reconciliation Canada and Hereditary Chief of the Gwawaenuk First Nation.

• Reconciliation demands that we relearn history and consider how the status quo works against a just future for all. South Africa is overcoming decades of divisions, and in Australia there is tremendous learning about correcting the colonial past. Here in Canada we have an exciting opportunity
to make reconciliation matter for our neighbourhoods, schools, and public places.

On this 46th Earth Day, we invite you to unpack what reconciliation means for our city and the planet. Please accept this call to celebrate – by connecting with wise elders,
artists and visionaries for lasting reconciliation. See the four-page program here…

Towards the Reconciliation Bridge & Vancouver’s High Line

by Joseph Roberts

• The January, 2016, edition of Common Ground contained an article about transforming the Georgia Viaduct into a Reconciliation Bridge, a symbolic link between First Nations and our invading, immigrating European culture. Our Walk for Reconciliation in 2013 drew estimates of 70,000 in the rain across our old Georgia Viaduct, inspiring this new vision: the Reconciliation Bridge. Martin Luther King Jr.’s daughter Bernice spoke that day of her father’s dream for healing inequalities in his famous I Have a Dream speech. Now we have our dream for a concrete way of honouring our commitment to First Nations.

The City owns the property; it’s our asset, as is the newly acquired CP rail Arbutus corridor, running from the east end of the Georgia Viaduct/Reconciliation Bridge, all the way to the Fraser River. Vancouver’s Mayor Robertson said (possibly in response to CG’s January article), “now Vancouver has its own High Line.” The comparison is to New York’s famed public project, which is a similarly raised viaduct. But we will only have a Low Line unless we connect the adjacent Viaduct to extend the Low Line ground-level Arbutus Corridor with the High Line Reconciliation Bridge (viaduct).

Imagine walking out from the VPL, the Queen Elizabeth Theatre, or the new City Art Gallery and stepping onto the Reconciliation High Line Bridge, to be inspired by the beautiful vistas from up-top; then, descending onto the Low Line, the recently acquired CP Arbutus Corridor rail line forming a garden path all the way to our magnificent Fraser River. It is all connected.

Re-purposing nine kilometres of old train track plus one kilometre of High Line / Georgia Viaduct, into a 10 kilometre garden park from the central core of Vancouver out to the shore of the mighty Fraser. What a gift to the citizens of Vancouver and a legacy for countless generations. We have the dream. We have the property. Now let’s come together to realize our vision of reconciling the past, honouring First Nations, and protecting this 10 kilometre link for posterity.

This is our generation’s opportunity to create a beautiful lasting parkway, as earlier generations did by saving Stanley Park. It is our turn to make a contribution to all our relations and make this a world class inspiration towards our common future.

Here is a letter from a Common Ground reader:

“Hello Joseph: I was in NYC in January and walked the High Line to the Whitney Museum. It was a cold, blustery day but still it was a very beautiful experience. I do so hope that we could have that same experience in Vancouver. Please keep me in the loop as to what’s going on. It would be great for City Hall to keep the viaduct. Thank you for all your work in this regard. All the best, Barbara.”

We can make this beautiful dream a reality. For information contact Common Ground, or email joseph@commonground.ca Lets move this healing dream forward.

The Trans Pacific Partnership

A bad deal for Canada, our food and our health

by Bobbie Blair

 

Dr. Chopra
Dr. Chopra

• More than a decade after he was fired from his position as senior scientific advisor at Health Canada for telling the truth, Canadian ‘whistleblower’ Dr. Shiv Chopra is now warning us about a new threat to our health and our food safety: the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP).

In 2004, Dr. Chopra lost his job for refusing to approve a genetically engineered bovine growth hormone (rBGH) developed to increase milk production in dairy cows. He faced an incredible amount of pressure to lie to the public, not only from the powerful biotech industry, but also from his superiors inside the government agency. Dr. Chopra’s story is still a red flag for us today: we cannot rely on the government to look out for our health. But while they took his job and destroyed his career, neither the industry nor Health Canada could rob Dr. Chopra of his good name. A Federal Court established it was not only his right, but also his duty to blow the whistle about rBGH health concerns, as a scientist holding a position of public trust. Dr. Chopra has no regrets. A couple of years ago, he told an audience, “I would blow the whistle again!” This year, he keeps his promise.

What (the heck) is the TPP?

Most people have no clue what the TPP is. Think of it as a massive bomb headed straight for Canada, one that will blow up our rights and freedoms to self-govern how we please. We will no longer be free to create our own laws and policies or to protect our environment and Canadian- owned businesses and industries, our food quality and much more. Dr. Chopra reminds us our food quality is already degraded by greedy industries. “There are numerous food-borne, chronic diseases on the rise, including cancer, obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular, neurological and reproductive disorders.” Most can be directly traced to “substances that are being utilized in food and agricultural production: hormones, antibiotics, slaughterhouse waste, pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs).”

We are already getting sick and the TPP will open the floodgates for more toxicity, cause an increase in chronic illness and allow foreign pharmaceutical companies to enter with their patented drugs to hike up drug prices. The TPP is bad for our health and for our economy. According to National Farmers Union (NFU) president Jan Slomp, “The Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) is designed to entrench the interests of foreign corporations and is an “attack on our supply management system,” adding, “The implications for the dairy sector are severe.”

Foreign corporations will cash-in and Canadians will lose, big time. Are we going to stand idly by or are we going to speak up and defend our rights?

Paul Manly, an International Trade and Investment critic, says this trade deal is impossible for an ordinary citizen to read. “The TPP consists of 30 chapters, 6,000 pages of text and appendices using legal language that… makes it difficult, if not impossible, for the average citizen to… comprehend… [But yet], it is important for the public to understand the implications of this far-reaching agreement…”

But then again, the TPP is not written for you and me, is it? Canadians just replaced a Federal government that treated us like feudal subjects with one that is now willing to listen, at least. But guess what? Prime Minister Trudeau has indicated he supports the TPP so unless we make our voices heard, he will sign us into this deal. Because Stephen Harper began the process in secret – despite the obligation he had to disclose the TPP proposal with citizens prior to signing anything – Canadians have no time to waste.

Please join Dr. Chopra and the Council of Canadians, who are among the many groups, including the David Suzuki Foundation, SumOfUs and LeadNow, and industries determined to save Canada from this disastrous deal. Over a decade ago, Dr. Chopra chose to speak up in defiance of those who wanted to put dangerous substances in our food in order to increase their profits. While he has no regrets about his choices, his actions and the consequences, he does want it to mean something for Canada. Dr. Chopra does not want to see the TPP or any other bad trade deal designed by corporations and their lawyers cancel out everything we all fought so hard for. This fight is for you and me – and our children. Please show that you care and make your voice heard.

How you can help

Dr. Chopra is speaking out, but he can’t stop the TPP without our help.

Petition: Please visit the website below to sign and share his petition: http://www.foodsovereigntycanada.com Every page and every signature counts.

Attend an event: Having already spoken at events in cities such as Montreal and Ottawa, Dr. Shiv Chopra is visiting BC this month. There will be eight events at various locations. Dr. Chopra is not charging any fee for speaking at these 100% volunteer-run events.

Courtenay: April 7 (7PM) Rotary Hall, Filberg Centre, 411Anderton Ave.

Nanaimo: April 8 (7PM) Bowen Park Complex, 500 Bowen Rd.

Duncan: April 9 (3PM) Island Savings Centre, (Mesachie Rm.) 2687 James St.

Victoria: April 10 (7PM) UVIC, David Turpin Building (A104).

Ladner: April 12 (7PM) Ladner Pioneer Library, 4683 51st St. Note: Ladner is looking for a larger venue. Check Facebook for any changes.

Langley: April 13 (7PM) Trinity Western University, 7600 Glover Rd.

Chilliwack: April 14 (7PM) Yarrow Community School, 4595 Wilson Rd.

Vancouver: April 16, (all day) SFU Harbour Centre (Rm. 320), 520 W. Hastings St.

Donate: The Langley COC chapter has set up a GoFundMe account to help this tour: www.gofundme.com/4fu2c4j5

Dr. Chopra’s Corrupt to the Core: Memoirs of a Health Canada Whistleblower is no longer in print, but a new DVD version has just been published in 2016.

Other related links:

Proton pump inhibitors pose some very serious risks

Think twice about taking heartburn drugs

DRUG BUST by Alan Cassels

PhotoHeadshotAlanCassels

• Warning: this column is for people who are taking (or have been offered) heartburn drugs or are considering treatment for heartburn. In other words: most of us. If you develop heartburn or ulcers, there is a good chance you’ll be offered a prescription from the most effective – and possibly most inappropriately over-consumed – class of drugs on the planet: a proton pump inhibitors or PPIs.

PPIs include drugs like omeprazole (Losec® or Prilosec® in the US), lansoprazole (Prevacid®), rabeprazole (Pariet®), pantoprazole (Pantoloc®) or esomeprazole (Nexium®). They are given for a variety of things including dyspepsia (a catchall term for digestive problems such as stomach discomfort, gas, bloating, belching, appetite loss and nausea), peptic ulcer disease (PUD), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Does stomach acid rising in your throat compel you to make a doctor’s visit? All I’m saying is there is a very good chance you’ll get a PPI faster than you can say “rebound acid hypersecretion.”

The popularity of these drugs is mind-blowingly huge and it’s not uncommon for people to wake up one day and realize they’ve been on the drug for a decade. Maybe you took your first one when you had a small developing ulcer or for an occasional bout of stomach acid that rises in your throat and burns like you’ve downed a red-hot poker. You feel bad because you have this nagging feeling you shouldn’t be taking the drug, but, at the same time, you’re strangely very happy because the little pill works really well in dowsing the flames.

There is one important thing you need to know from the approved product label for PPIs: they are approved for “short-term treatment” of GERD and duodenal and stomach ulcers that are “resistant” to antacids and H2-blockers. The operative phrase is “short term”, so what explains the fact there are upwards of 10 million scripts written every year for PPIs in Canada (about 100 million in the US), the third highest-selling class of drugs in North America?

For starters, PPIs are extremely effective at influencing the production of acid by the stomach. Remember, stomach acid is your friend, helping digest food and preventing infections, but too much of it in the wrong place can be uncomfortable. Up to 30 percent of Canadians will experience some kind of reflux in their lives and peptic ulcers affect roughly 10 percent of us. “Peptic ulcer” is an umbrella term for certain lesions – little pits or “craters” – in the mucous membranes or lining of the stomach and duodenum (top part of the small intestine), which can cause significant pain, bleeding, and, in rare cases, can erode all the way through the wall of the GI tract, leading to a perforated ulcer.

After we chew food, it makes its way down the esophagus and into our stomachs where the process of digestion begins: acid breaks down the food into its essential nutrients. GERD occurs when acid from the stomach ‘backs up’ into the esophagus, irritating it and, in the process, causing heartburn, nausea, burping or belching and an unpleasant taste in the mouth. A sphincter at the junction between the esophagus and the stomach is supposed to prevent your stomach contents from backing up into the esophagus, but it can malfunction for a variety of reasons. Generally, this happens after meals when the stomach is full and when lying down.

For eons, we thought ulcers were caused by stress and that the treatment was antacids, a bland diet or surgery. The ‘stress’ theory of ulcers soon came to be replaced by the ‘bacteria’ theory where a bacterium, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) was found to be one of the key causes of ulcers. In the early ‘70s, a revolutionary class of drugs – the H2 antagonists, including drugs like Tagamet or Zantac – were blockbusters in their own right, yet a mere shadow compared to the PPIs, which appeared on the scene in the mid ‘90s. Omeprazole (Losec® in Canada, Prilosec® in the US) was the first in a class of drugs that took the world of acid suppression drugs to a whole new level.

As I’ve said in the past, first comes the marketing, then comes the science, then comes the regret. I would say the PPIs are currently in the ‘regret’ stage. Soon after omeprazole hit the market in 1995, there were reports of adverse effects, including joint and muscle pain, muscle weakness and swelling. And cases of kidney inflammation were reported in some patients after the first few months of starting omeprazole.

In fact, during those early days, some doctors feared PPIs were too effective, because they allowed gluttony to run unchecked. They became a passport to stuffing one’s face without any consequences. In the early days, there were also concerns that prolonged use of PPIs could mask danger signs, such as cancer symptoms. In England, such concerns led to a 1998 warning from the Medical Research Council, which criticized doctors for putting all their indigestion patients on PPIs and failing to ‘step down’ to basic remedies. The Council warned patients would get put on a PPI and never actually have to deal with the lifestyle or other factors conspiring to cause the acid reflux in the first place.

Nearly 20 years later, what can we say? “Boy, were they ever right.” It seems that the strongest drugs to block acid, the high dose PPIs, turned out to be the most dangerous to use especially in the long term and in the elderly. But what sort of dangers do they pose?

The long-term consumption of PPIs has a range of potential dire consequences, which I’ve deemed the Four Risks of the PPI Apocalypse:

Rebound acid hypersecretion risk: wonder why so many people start the drug and can’t stop taking it? Dude, you can become dependent on PPIs in as little as four weeks on the stuff. This is a serious adverse effect that few people seem to be taking seriously. It is based on the fact that once you start feeling better, you stop taking the drug. The acid reflux comes back so strong it knocks you off your feet, therefore you go get another prescription. You have, sadly, become addicted to the stuff.

Fracture risks: taking PPIs for the long term in multiple daily doses increases risks of fractures of the hip, wrist or spine. When you’re tampering with the stomach flora, you’re also tinkering with the composition of your bones. Snap. Crackle. Pop.

Infection risks: the drugs are known to lead to an increased risk of infections, including pneumonia and C. difficile, which is particularly dire for elderly people who have spent time in a hospital. It could lead to them spending many more weeks in the hospital, or worse, dead.

Magnesium deficiency risk: it has taken a while, but information on the risk of severe magnesium deficiency has accumulated and is well known. If you are taking certain meds that alter your heart rhythm, low magnesium can make things a lot worse, including possibly life-threatening heart rhythm disruptions or arrhythmias.

Wait, there’s a fifth: a study out of Stanford University last summer found that “PPI use was associated with a roughly 20 percent increase in the rate of subsequent heart attack risk among all adult PPI users.” Those are pretty powerful words.

What to do when simple heartburn can lead you down a drug-filled path that could lead to a heart attack? Think alternatives.

There are tons of alternatives that can help relieve stomach acid and the best of these are lifestyle adjustments: losing some weight, eating more fibre, quitting smoking and drinking more water or green tea. Less restrictive clothing helps some people and some have found success with ginger, cabbage juice, digestive enzymes and probiotics.

In other words, you can search out alternatives, many of which might not be as powerful as a PPI, but there is something to be said for taking less powerful medicine; it is less likely to kill you or cause collateral damage that could make your life worse.

Alan Cassels is a pharmaceutical policy researcher in Victoria and author of the just-published The Cochrane Collaboration: Medicine’s Best Kept Secret. Follow him on Twitter at @akecassels

TEDx Stanley Park

Ideas to Action

by Roger Killen

portrait of Roger Killen
Roger Killen

• TEDx conferences audiences laugh, learn and walk away with actionable wisdom. Live speakers share innovative optimistic solutions to humanity’s tough challenges and give clear actionable answers to make a difference in our lives. These ideas build aw

areness, power attitude shifts, change policies and launch movements that inspire positive change.

It was 2012. I was 61 and open to taking on a project that would be my legacy to mankind. I attended a local TEDx event and eureka, I became clear on the shape, size and form of my legacy project. TEDx Stanley Park was born.

In 2013, the first TEDx Stanley Park event took place in front of 100 guests at The Theatre inside the UBC Campus at Robson Square in downtown Vancouver. In 2015, the second TEDx Stanley Park event took place in front of 450 at the Granville Island Stage. Its thirteen talks evoked a record-breaking seven standing ovations.

TEDxStanleyPark 2016 takes place at the Queen Elizabeth Theatre on Saturday, May 28. Our Ideas to Action theme guided our selection of talks to those that contain powerful calls to action that give legs to dreams. 15 speakers will share their personal, powerful and diverse life-stories with you and 2,640 others. Book this date into your calendar now. Here is a sneak preview of some of the topics to be covered.

 

Dan Lok
Dan Lok

Entrepreneur Dan Lok’s talk is titled Why Don’t Great Ideas Succeed? He knows why and gives the audience ideas to help them realize their personal or business goals and dreams.

Maureen McGrath
Maureen McGrath

Sex therapist Maureen McGrath exposes how the growth in sexless marriages has reached epidemic proportions. She serves up tips to get lust and exciting love making back into our marital bedrooms.

Gary Paterson
Gary Paterson

United Church minister Gary Paterson reminds us how discrimination is subtle but ubiquitous. He uses creative storytelling as the gateway to new understanding, and appreciation of minorities into our mainstream society.

Galya Westler
Galya Westler

Technology entrepreneur Galya Westler’s talk addresses Social Media. Our addiction to social mediacan make us lonely, disconnected and depressed. She answers the big question – how to kick the habit and get the life we want back?

Ryan Phillips
Ryan Phillips

Former hockey-player Ryan Phillips’ new project Return to Happiness focuses on ending human trafficking and sex slavery which affects two million children. His organization fosters leadership in addressing this global epidemic.

Bosco Anthony
Bosco Anthony

Bosco Anthony is a digital strategist. His title talk Feeling Stuck? will guide us through a transformation from being just spectators in our lives to proactively designing a rich, full and purposeful life we love to live.

Isabelle Mercier
Isabelle Mercier

Isabelle Mercier is a branding consultant who knows how too much worry dearly costs us in health and happiness. She offers simple effective processes to quickly improve confidence and peace of mind.

Gurdeep Parhar
Gurdeep Parhar

Physician Gurdeep Parhar’s talk is titled Fixing Racism. When racial stereotyping manifests there are definite things we can all do to create harmony with people among all races.

Connor Beaton
Connor Beaton

Connor Beaton’s talk Behind the Man Mask reveals the complex challenges and conflicts that men face today. Connor calls on men to find freedom, experience self-expression and uncover a more real, fulfilling life for themselves and their relations.

Jessica Pautsch
Jessica Pautsch

Jessica Pautsch shows how ownership is an old broken social model and they are pretty exciting modern alternatives. She shows there are many good reasons why sharing is superior and necessary for our future survival. And way more fun too.

Iman Aghay
Iman Aghay

Iman Aghay’s talk title is Nothing to Regret. He will illuminate how small bad habits cause lifelong regrets and offer up tips to replace them with healthy, healing and happy habits.

Karn Manhas
Karn Manhas

In a talk titled Don’t Let the Bed Bugs Bite, Karn Manhas addresses an epidemic sweeping the world. He offers easy-to-use natural solutions for bugs that can really tick us off and cause emotional stress.

Jules Ku-Lea
Jules Ku-Lea

Jules Ku-Lea shows how many everyday food products are built on the backs of slaves. She educates to stop slave labour, offers consumers tools to cut through hidden abuses and marketplace deception.

Kieron Sweeney
Kieron Sweeney

Kieron Sweeney is a seasoned rider of financial roller coasters. He challenges the school system to teach financial literacy to achieve financial security. Too many people retire broke and Kieron wants to fix the problem.

Sita Sahasrabudhe
Sita Sahasrabudhe

Sita Sahasrabudhe knows that 20% of the world suffers from chronic illness and 80% misunderstand the personal or professional consequences. Sita empowers you to make a difference for yourself, and others.

Each speaker is passionate about their topic. Their talks reflect their highest truths. Their experience and wisdom will inspire each of us to thrive personally and discover exciting ways to make positive change in the world. That’s what TEDxStanleyPark is all about.

Visit www.tedxstanleypark.com

The impacts of Expo 86 – 30 years later

by Bruce Mason

Expo 86 button• It’s three decades since Vancouver sold its soul. Threw future generations out with dirty False Creek water.

If you’re 30-something, you missed the mega-party, so it’s ironic, or pathetic, that you’re now paying more than your fair (pun intended) share of the tab. The more you know about ‘then,’ the better you to understand ‘now,’ and our new reality of tragic unaffordabilty.

Older readers may recall that glorious Expo 86 summer exceeding all expectations. When buses were emblazoned with “don’t miss it for the world.” Simpler times; a house was a place to live, starter-homes and handyman-specials cost five, maybe six figures, but much less than millions.

It all happened in 173 acres of glitz and coloured zones, along the north and east banks of False Creek, from the Granville Bridge to Quebec Street, after a century of heavy industry, a smelly, polluted, ramshackle, rundown eyesore of old rails and urban blight.

The south side, in stark contrast, had housing communities, – such as the False Creek housing coop, inspired by the Habitat 1976; UN Conference on Human Settlement – parks, Granville Island Public Market, and other products of the ‘70s “city beautiful” movement on the sand-spit originally named Industrial Island.

BC was suffering – stuck, as always, in the vise grip of resource dependency’s boom and bust cycles – through seven years of bad luck, the awful ‘80s. But post secondary tuition was about a grand, a little sweat in a summer’s wages. And interest on savings was near, or at, double digits. Some citizens wished for -and got- a big stadium, some rapid transit, a trade and convention centre, a high-priced hockey team, etc., etc.

Expo 86 expert and University of Wisconsin urban geographer, Kris Olds, wrote about the “perfect resolution” for the lust of B.C.’s political and business elites to forge links with wildly successful Asian economies and become a centre for Pacific Rim commerce.

“In many ways it was more of an accelerator, than the cause of Vancouver’s transition to a more global, metropolitan and cosmopolitan identity,” he opined.

An ‘accelerator’ on speed and steroids, at the edge of the rainforest, a new possibility for a post-industrial parking lot of portable capital. Pave a bit of contaminated paradise with something shiny, eye-catching; a sleight of hand; attraction, distraction and hidden costs, real costs, now you see them, now you don’t.

Lance Berelowitz, author of Dream City: Vancouver and the Global Imagination, moved here, back then, and like others was wowed by natural physical beauty and relatively undervalued property.

Archie comic book Expo 86He recalls watching nightly fireworks from a Mount Pleasant apartment balcony: “ It was like Vancouver was coming out at a debutant ball: ‘Hi guys. We’re here, we’re sexy and we have this to sell. What do you want to buy?’”

Later, Mayor Mike Harcourt – while trying to rid that particular neighbourhood of prostitutues – would describe ‘solicitation’ as “somewhere between a wink and a half Nelson.” Expo 86 was that kind of sales pitch. It worked wonders, world-wide.

Back in the day, when gutsy journalists – rather than bubbly, chatty, cheerleading careerists – worked in media, the delightfully caustic Sun columnist, Marjorie Nichols, described it as a “big, glittering, attention-riveting, reality-deflecting untruth about BC.”

Fearing huge deficits – like Montreal’s Olympics (1976) and world expositions in Knoxville (82) and New Orleans (84) – Mike Harcourt first opposed the fair, a major plank in his 1980 mayoralty run and first term at 12th and Cambie.

But organizers created a lottery – 6/49 (still very much with us) – and cut multimillion dollar corporate deals, adding numbers, including zeros.”To stop moving is to die,” advised a character in the highly popular Spirit Lodge, at General Motors Pavilion. Coke, CN, CP, Royal Bank, Minolta, McDonald’s and more signed on for on-site monopolies, built amusements. The dawn of global corporations, a handful of gimme and a mouthful of much obliged.

This was all before cell phones, which is almost impossible to imagine today; back then, just a gleam in someone’s eye. Everything at Expo was billed as innovative and folks went Ga-Ga over an IBM touch screen. Imagine – just put a finger on a screen and voila. Cameras were ubiquitous and Kodak – the only film available on-site – paid for the picture-perfect, nightly fireworks and the Musical Ride venue.

The crowds grew exponentially from May 2 to Oct. 13

“They didn’t go home,” Harcourt observed on the 25th anniversary. “They’re still comin’! Your east side home is now worth what a castle is in France. But your kids have to go to France to be able to afford to live.”

The fair’s first president, American, Michael Bartlett, set the pace, and tone, as a relatively modest Transpo 86 fair morphed into the 1986 World Exposition on Transportation and Communication, “World in Motion – World in Touch.”

“If you get 180,000 people and there’s only 160,000 things to do, you’re going to have 20,000 pissed off. You get ‘em on the site, you feed ‘em, you make ‘em dizzy, and you scare the s— out of ‘em’,” advised Bartlett. He was fired by Jimmy Pattison, who took over the reins.

Entertaiment trumped educational content. Jimmy prowled in a checkered jacket, picking up litter, famously offering to be chief executive officer for $1 a year and paying for personal expenses. His current estimated worth now exceeds $7 billion.

Expo 86 is the acknowledged prototype and case study for the phenomena of escalation. The avowed “purpose” was to celebrate Vancouver’s centenary, rather than turn a profit (although, obviously, massive private fortunes would be made at the public’s expense). Expenditures were justified as short-term urban renewal and economic development, in a long-term urban housing plan, predicted to be realized in far-off 2016.

Any Vancouver history must include always-volatile average house prices, in this case, pre- and post-Expo. The median price had more than doubled, from $86,000 (January, 1980) to $177,000 (January 1981). But when the Bank of Canada rate hit 21 per cent in August, the average house price had fallen back to $110,000, by summer, 1982.

After Expo 86, (January, 1989), it was way up, to $220,000. Modest 1,000-square-foot heritage bungalows were bulldozed into landfills. “Monsters houses ” were all the talk – four times the size – and the city would be dubbed “Hongcouver.”

An elaborately staged, mega-event had been designed to attract property investors to park (or launder) their money. In the meantime,Vancouverites would have more-than-enough entertaiment, and venues, inlcuding free non-stop ‘street’ attractions and unlimited late-night booze. The genesis of a city as a luxury hotel.

Afterwards, Hong Kong’s richest tycoon, Li Ka-shing bought the site for $320 million, so son, Victor, would have a high-profile project to develop his expertise and to establish a North American base for his empire. Taxpayers would pick up the cost of shufflling around toxically contaminated soil – 70 million and still with us, still climbing.

Olds believes the purchase had more impact on Vancouver’s future than the fair. It attracted off-shore investment, unlocking massive real estate development and Asian dollars, including Ka-shing’s Concord Pacific, the project developer.

UBC geographer David Ley is a leading expert on how world “gateway” cities are changing through rich in-migration. Last month he published a peer-reviewed paper in The International Journal of Housing Policy.

Expo 86, was a key event in government strategy to market the city to Asians, Ley notes in “Global China and the making of Vancouver’s residential property market.” He concludes that most politicians accept skyrocketting prices and mortgage debt as “collateral damage” from ‘growing’ the B.C. economy. Coin-operated government for global elites.

Expo 86 opened floodgates through Canada’s immigration polices, including the business immigration program, and BC’s laughably lax, but deliberate, property investment legislation.

The real, ongoing, long-term costs are highlighted in a recent Vancity report. It predicts massive worker shortages and a looming out-migration in search of affordable housing, including the most poorly paid university grads, compared to 10 other major Canadian cities.

Wages from 85 of 88 local, in-demand jobs will be insufficient for anyone who seeks to own a roof over their heads in Vancouver. In this housing market – first uncoupled from economic reality and stagnating incomes during Expo 86 – future nurses, firefighters, police officers, family doctors and others, SOL.

Legacies include the promise of a public park on nine acres of pavement. Also: the 10,000 demolition permits between 2004 and 2015 as the city began to bulldoze three houses per day into landfills. Towers – endless towers – began rising, phallic-like, obliterating the view of nature, with fewer and fewer places to live, play, raise kids and community.

Wasn’t that a party? How about the brutal housing hangover?

To be continued.

Email your comments to brucemason@shaw.ca.


Expo 86 by the numbers

Bad press for the on-again, off-again fair included evictions from Eastside hotels and rooming houses. Long-time resident Olaf Solheim committed suicide and Pete Seeger staged a free concert in his memory.

Taking part: 54 nations, 12 provinces/states, 14 corporate or specialized pavilions in the largest gathering of entertainment for the biggest party in BC history; 4,000 children (and 587 adults) were Lost and Found.

Charles and Diana opened it. She fainted, which attracted additional global attention. There were approximately 150 other performances each day – some 43,000 in total – from La Scala opera, to street jugglers, a still-revered Bill Cosby, and uncrowned ‘Queen,’ Liberace.

Early rain made some exhibitors homesick, but 130 of 172 days were uncharacteristically dry.

The final count: 22 million visits exceeded projections of 13.7. Average daily attendance was 120,000; the largest,341,806, was Sunday, October 12, a fever pitch for a fond, last look and the challenge to push up attendance as far as possible.

There were 158 structures; 52 restaurants in which $94 million was spent on food, $4.2 million on hot dogs alone.

$20 million was dropped on amusement rides: the Space Tower, Cariboo Log Chute, Looping Starship, Scream Machine, and 1907 Toboggan Co. Carrousel.

Total cost; $1.5 billion, shared by Ottawa, Victoria and corporations. Lotto 6/49 – now a feature of west coast life – was invented to cover the $311M deficit.

25,000+ full-time jobs were created. A special unemployment office was set up, post-fair, added again to BC’s 12.2 % unemployment.

“Residuals” include the Inuktitut on English Bay, China Gate, on Pender Street, the restored Locomotive #374 inside the Roundhouse, the world’s largest hockey stick in Duncan and Folklife on Gabriola.

Park benches, planters, and furniture were auctioned off and strewn from the PNE and White Rock, to Cultus Lake.

For a list and photos, visit: http://bobbea.com/expo-86/whatever2.html

The problem with animal research

by John Pranger

• Sponsored by the Animal Defense & Anti-Vivisection Society of BC. vivisectionresearch.ca

Monkey animal for researchThe arrival in Canada each year of monkeys destined for the laboratory shows the entrenched nature of Canada’s R&D community. While the use of animals in medical research and toxicity testing is being scaled back elsewhere in the world – due to a recognition of the inadequacy of this research – in Canada, more than three million animals are subjected to experimentation in publicly funded institutions every year.

Many of these animals are subjected to procedures involving severe pain “near, at or above the pain tolerance threshold of unanesthetized, conscious animals” (Category of Invasiveness = E). This means that, annually, thousands of animals suffer prolonged, unendurable pain at the hands of Canadian scientists. And these statistics only hold true of those institutes that report to the Canadian Council on Animal Care; private facilities are not compelled to follow CCAC guidelines nor to divulge their animal usage. What makes this sorry situation all the more unacceptable is the plain fact that human medicine has not been improved by the use of animals in this way.

In 2004, the British Medical Journal published an article titled “Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans?” It states, “The public often consider it axiomatic that animal research has contributed to the treatment of human disease, yet little evidence is available to support this view.” (BMJ, 2004; 328:514-517, 28 Feb)

After over 150 years of animal research, literally billions of animals used, billions of taxpayer dollars spent and regular news articles claiming that animal research benefits humans, this revelation might shock you. Equally, the enormous damage to human health that has been caused by animal experimentation is little known.

Experimenters receive billions of tax and charity dollars to conduct experiments that leading scientists say only serve to hinder and prevent medical progress. Anti-vivisectionist doctors, surgeons and scientists have long denounced animal studies as scientifically invalid – but so far with precious little result. The damage to human health comes in many forms. It ranges from the more visible harm caused by dangerous drugs that have passed animal tests, to more subtle forms such as the medically-invasive attitude that animal experimentation has helped advance. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has reported that 92% of all the drugs found safe and effective in animal tests were either unsafe or ineffective in humans. We’d be better off just flipping a coin!

From Opren to Fen-Phen, from Thalidomide to Vioxx – withdrawn in 2004 after killing more than 100,000 people, having been deemed “safe” after being tested on monkeys and other species ­– the toll of pharmaceutical harm is a devastating indictment of the way we have allowed established science to flourish while more scientifically credible, effective and humane non-animal research remains on the back burner.

Important therapies such as chloroform and penicillin were almost derailed altogether due to their inefficacy in the animal model. Nobody can say how many possible cures have been similarly discarded due to their poor performance in animals. Even the most infinitesimal difference between species can render the data derived from one species inapplicable in another. Cancers that spontaneously arise in humans cannot be understood by artificially inducing tumours in animals under unnatural laboratory conditions. As an exasperated Thomas E. Wagner, senior scientist at Ohio University’s Edison Bio-Technology Institute, put it, “God knows we’ve cured mice of all sorts of tumours. But that isn’t medical research.” (The Columbus Dispatch, March 20, 1998)

Human arthritis cannot be replicated by experiments, which attempt to artificially “recreate” the disease by crushing or hammering the joints of animals. Poisoning the brains of monkeys to simulate Parkinson’s disease results only in Parkinson’s-like symptoms – and all the human tragedy these entail – being forced onto terrified and immobilized monkeys. True PD cannot be replicated in this way. Technological advances have led to the development of far more relevant, human-based approaches to these and other human diseases and must be implemented if we are to conquer human disease. (See: Marius Maxwell, MB,BChir, DPhil – http://www.vero.org.uk/press7.asp

Most current research into degenerative diseases is designed to discover patentable, synthetic drugs that suppress symptoms as a long-term treatment, but don’t heal the patient who is often prescribed a “cocktail” of drugs to counteract the “side-effects” of the previous drugs. Israeli physician Dr. Arie Brecher explains, “From an animal, one can get only a very approximate indication of how a human will react under similar circumstances.

But this is not science – it’s a lottery. However, we are not playing games. At stake are health and life. The day it was decided to develop medicaments using animal models, it was a sad day for mankind. People began to get sick and to die due to medications. A new epoch in medicine started: the epoch of iatrogenic diseases, caused by doctors, by medical therapies. In the US, at least one and a half million people are hospitalized every year due to the intake of drugs and many die. For the first time in history, medicine causes disasters instead of curing illness.” (See: Brecher http://vivisectionresearch.ca/1000MDs.pdf)

Despite continual reports of “imminent medical breakthroughs” and so-called “miracle drugs,” our health situation is not improving. Total spending on health care in Canada is well over $200 billion, growing an estimated five percent per year and threatening to choke the Provincial budgets. The awarding of millions of dollars in Canadian government grants every year to research involving animal experiments is a constant drain on the taxpayer as it displaces money that should be going to patient care and clinical research methods. To make matters worse, the animal researchers alone decide which grant proposals will receive funding; through the system of peer review, vivisectors submit grant proposals and sit on the same committees that approve such grants. In any other area, this conflict of interest and corresponding lack of cost-benefit analysis would simply not occur. In the self-monitored world of animal research, it is business as usual.

In addition to taxpayer sponsored government grants, animal research is funded by private charities. This money is donated by well-meaning people in good faith that it will be spent on valid research. These people hope that their donations will help find a cure for the disease in question. They may be unaware that their donations help to finance often bizarre, frequently repetitive, always cruel and sadly ineffective animal research.

As medical consumers and taxpayers, we have an absolute right to question the mismanagement of our health and why our healthcare needs are not being advanced. With our money, the biomedical research industry has created a system, which is completely self-monitored and self-regulated. It is imperative that we demand from government that animal experimentation be replaced immediately by the valid research that will enable us to create a healthy – and yes, humane – society.

John Pranger is a director-emeritus of the Animal Defence and Anti-Vivisection Society of BC. His essays on the history and proliferation of animal experimentation have helped to spearhead the ADAV’s public outreach campaigns, including Stop UBC Animal Research and the new Humane Charities Canada initiative.

EVENT April 16-24 marks the annual World Week for Animals in Laboratories. To become involved or to learn more about the ADAV Society, visit www.stopubcanimalresearch.org

On the trail of humanistic transpersonal psychology

by Claudio Naranjo

• In my first English book, The One Quest (1972) – translated from the Spanish La Unica Busqueda – I delved into the subject of the Human Potential Movement. Later, at the Stanford Research Institute, I was a consultant for the Study of Educational Politics Institute and I was entrusted to explore this movement, which had its roots in Esalen, the most practical and experiential component of humanistic transpersonal psychology. It later emerged as an academic translation of that phenomenon. At Stanford, I was tasked with discovering the possible application of the Human Potential Movement in education.

Only later did I realize the person who entrusted me with this task, Willis Harman, was a pioneer, as until then, mainstream education had not been interested in such matters. Even today, education insists on being the most obsolete and antiquated of our institutions. We are still taught, in the style of the 18th century, to produce repeaters and to give information, instead of helping develop penetrating minds.

Curiously, many stimuli have inspired me from the world of education, to the point that I have become passionate about the topic. Our education system is responsible for the consciousness we have and the world we create. As of yet, we have not had an overall education system that works towards affectivity or enables students to become more virtuous, conscious and authentic people. This is missing from our current education system.

It is said that consciousness is intentional – consciousness of things, consciousness and object. However, the process of being conscious of consciousness is difficult, since what one looks for in meditation is a consciousness without object. This is a self-consciousness that does not go through reflection. It is a mysterious phenomenon. That is satori, contact with the nature of the mind or whatever you may call it. It is as if one were slowly acquiring, little by little, a bit more of a cosmic perspective – a perspective in which things are observed from afar, without attachment.

I have a lot of faith in meditation, not just in therapy, but also in the therapist as a transformative agent. My ‘60s writing, The Healing Journey, explained the potential of certain novel pharmacologic agents of that time as enhancers to psychotherapy such as MDMA, MDA, ayahuasca and ibogaine. It was a slightly magical moment in my life due to the density of synchronicities. And I found myself with what are now called empathogens or entactogens.

I describe that there are substances that are not hallucinogens, but more like microphones and microscopes, which help one see the emotional life with more comprehension. And I called them feeling enhancers, optimizers of feeling. I discovered a substance that was extremely useful for therapy, different from LSD.

Later on, I became interested in harmaline. It is a long story, but something attracted me to the study of that plant. So I began to experiment with it and it wasn’t long before I realized it had very similar properties to ayahuasca. Now, it constitutes a huge psychedelic business; there are many centres in the world that thrive from the use of ibogaine to curb addictions. It has that special effect. It is used a great deal in the treatment of addictions, as it is legally allowed in many parts of the world. My experience is that these things fell into my hands, one after another, at a moment where I was perhaps in the right place at the right time.

Of course, the shaman is the original therapist, but he is also the archaic, original mystic. And at one time, meditation and therapy or spirituality and therapy were not separate. We are now returning to a neo-shamanic culture, one could say, because of this interest, this recognition that both belong to the same meta-discipline. One difference between shamanism and psychotherapy is the frequent use of the so-called magic plants. Another difference is that shamans do not have an ideology; they do not have theories about psychotherapy. They figure it out however they can. By “figure out,” I mean, their presence has an effect. They are a bit like healers. Even if they do not explicitly act as healers, their presence has a healing influence. They may do this or that, but it is their presence that has an effect. Therefore, their training is not like that of the therapist, who has learned therapeutic theory.

My LSD experience was very important and it coincided with my already being on the yage trail, which is now called ayahuasca, but in Colombia it was called yage. I had had a conversation with Richard Schultes, the famous botanist who had identified the plants in yage and he gave me the information to get in touch with his plant gatherers among the indigenous Cofan people in Colombia. When I finished my Fulbright scholarship in the US, I went on an expedition to Putumayo, by way of Chile, and there I started to investigate.

It was an interesting experience for me – not just because of what I learned through foreign experiences about the archetypal world, but also because it inspired me to play a role I did not intend on playing: the therapist role. And it turned out to be my deep reconnection with therapy.

Meditation retreat June 5 -11, for information www.claudionaranjo.com

Colour light therapy

How it works

by Julianne Bien

Colour Theraphy • In her closing address at the UN-sponsored International Year of Light conference in Mérida, Mexico, in February, UNESCO’s (1) Assistant Director-General for Natural Sciences, Flavia Schlegel, stressed the importance of practical, cost-effective light-based solutions for the realization of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

We are finally starting to fully appreciate the power of light, globally. Its advanced uses on land, at sea, deep under ground and far out in space prove we are able to tap the essence of the world around us.

But how about the world inside us? Health-related uses of light include diagnostics, surgery, psychiatry, psychology, revitalization, rejuvenation and emotional and spiritual makeovers. We have laser-based instruments, LED-based apparatuses, full-spectrum lights and various digital and analogue devices.

Where we lag behind is in understanding how, exactly, our bodies respond to light. This is why terms such as chromotherapy, phototherapy and light therapy in general – although ancient in origin – very slowly progress toward full endorsement of the medical establishment.

Auto-immune problems, emotional trauma, allergies, metabolic imbalances, seasonal affective disorder, jet lag, sleep and attention deficit disorders often respond better to light than to traditional medical interventions. And there are good reasons for that; we just haven’t explored them enough.

In the 20th century, photo-biologist John Ott was hired to document the effects of pharmaceutical drugs on living cells, with an electronic microscope and a special camera. Ott noticed that changing the colour filters on his camera lens changed the cells’ behaviour. In fact, lens colour change had a more dramatic effect on the cells than did the observed drugs.

On the ‘ground level’ where life in our bodies unfolds, light and colour have more say than chemical compounds which we concoct. Our cells naturally understand the language of light and its messages – which the colours convey through their frequencies – to ignite, burn, sizzle, scorch, smoulder or go off. That’s the same cycle the stars in our universe undergo.

I’m often asked how colour light therapy really works. It appears esoteric and mystical, bordering on magic. The best analogy I know – one we all know well – is fire.

Fire is quirky. It is our species’ first tool, process and weapon. It gives off light and heat on demand, echoing our life-giving star in the sky, and we get to wield it at will. If you look closely, it varies in colour, depending on intensity. At first, it’s yellow and orange; green flame tips and blue-ish bursts will tell you it’s sizzling; you’ll want it bright white, though, if you wish to melt metal or bake clay.

Still, starting and maintaining a fire is tricky, at best. It’s moody. It might flare up in an instant or just smoulder for hours. Sometimes, a trained hand gives up in frustration; another time a fire will light itself up. Too much moisture around it and it won’t even start; too little and it burns itself out.

So it is with us. We are internal combustion engines, with trillions of tiny burners. Our cells burn up oxygen and produce heat. They use the resulting light as an ultra-fast messaging system. It all works to perfection – from toes to teeth – except when it won’t.

When an imbalance sets in, our internal flame in an organ dies down. Or it flares up, past all safety limits, causing redness, fever and pain. We don’t know what triggers this any more than we can pinpoint the cause of a wild forest fire or control it.

Knowing how tiny our internal burners are, it’s easy to see how fine-tuned and delicate any support we give them must also be.

Most light-based treatments rely on emitting an intense light beam or outputting a wide swath of bright light – one way. Interaction is not usually foreseen. In contrast, hand-held colour light illuminators work off the silent communication between the person sending faint light and the person receiving it.

Instant reactions – live bio-feedback – guide the hand holding the penlight. By spontaneously adjusting the angle and the height of the light beam, we work within the aura and can affect all levels (physical, emotional and spiritual). As with lighting a fire, intuition and experience play a part. This adaptability is why low-intensity, hand-held colour light therapy tools and protocols are so effective.

Colour light therapy is ancient. Thousands of years-old records exist of diagnoses and cures based on colours. Chromotherapy is a well-travelled road to wellness we’ve all but forgotten over time.

With more research and even a fraction of the resources that are poured into developing chemical cures, we could restore much of what was known long ago about light and potentially discover more colour power than we ever imagined.

© 2016. Julianne Bien is the inventor of the Spectrahue method of colour light therapy. She owns Spectrahue Light & Sound Inc., a Toronto-based company that distributes its original LumaLight hand-held tools and educational materials, including books, DVDs and live trainings. www.spectrahue.com

(1) United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

*No medical claims are made or implied. This information does not replace the advice and care of your medical health care professional.

EVENT: Course in Lumalight Color & Geometry

Vancouver: May 14-15 This two-day course is for those who are serious about learning the science, theory and practical applications of The Spectrahue Method™ with Lumalight tools, and integrate it into a holistic or spiritual practice. For more information and to register, visit www.spectrahue.com or call (416) 340-0882.

The real poison pill in the Trans-Pacific Partnership

INDEPENDENT MEDIA

by Meghan Sali

 

portrait of Meghan Sali
Meghan Sali

• Canadians have many reasons to be concerned about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a massive international agreement that, if ratified, will result in restrictive new rules governing our daily lives, from how we use the Internet to how much we pay for medicine.

We already know the TPP will extend copyright terms for decades, keeping valuable cultural content out of the hands of new artists and the public. We know it will hamstring Canadian innovation; Canadian tech entrepreneurs tell us how it locks in the economic advantage US firms already enjoy in the intellectual property sector.

But the real poison pill in the TPP lies in its “investor-state dispute settlement” mechanism, or ISDS. Economists from all sides of the political spectrum have warned how the TPP’s ISDS rules would allow foreign conglomerates to challenge our domestic laws and subject Canada to multi-million dollar lawsuits.

For example, if Canada updates its copyright rules to the benefit of users, we could be sued for millions, if not billions, by powerful and unaccountable foreign conglomerates. Although ISDS is not a new idea – similar rules appear in the 20-year-old NAFTA and in the more recently completed Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) – many citizens are only now coming to understand the negative implications.

In fact, Canadian and European governments are already rethinking CETA’s ISDS rules, due to widespread concern about how they enable powerful conglomerates to undermine national sovereignty. Increasingly, people are asking why we should prioritize the profits of giant conglomerates over the right of citizens to legislate in their own self-interest – for example, by creating balanced intellectual property laws.

This raises two important points: first, if the government can go back to the drawing board with CETA, an agreement that is long completed and well into the ratification process, surely it can do the same with the TPP. But Canadians have repeatedly been told the TPP is now closed to any modification, despite the fact that the public, not to mention our current federal government, was completely excluded from the talks. This simply isn’t good enough. The government should stand up for Canadians and demand better.

Second, we’re now fully seeing just how unpopular extreme ISDS rules really are. Citizens of many industrialized nations, Germany in particular, find the terms of ISDS unacceptable and are increasingly voicing their unease. The more people learn about ISDS, the less they like it.

They’re not wrong. Looking at Canada’s own past record in ISDS proceedings, it becomes clear we’re rarely a winner. Canada has been called the most-sued nation under free trade agreements and a Canadian company has never won an ISDS case at a trade dispute panel under NAFTA.

Let me leave you with two final points about the TPP’s ISDS rules: there’s no way to challenge ISDS decisions once they’re made and if and when we lose a case, the government will not disclose how much Canada has been penalized. We could end up forfeiting billions in an opaque tribunal system, staffed by ex-lobbyists, for which there is no appeal process.

Does this sound like a fair deal to you? If not, join with thousands of your fellow Canadians and let the government know what you think at LetsTalkTPP.ca

Meghan Sali is a digital rights specialist with OpenMedia, which works to keep the Internet open, affordable and surveillance-free.